<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lily Allen &#8211; 22</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098</link>
	<description>Pop, to two decimal places</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iain</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-3664</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-3664</guid>
		<description>First time in this whole thing that I&#039;ve wanted to take Lily&#039;s side, there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First time in this whole thing that I&#8217;ve wanted to take Lily&#8217;s side, there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-3655</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-3655</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL9-esIM2CY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL9-esIM2CY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL9-esIM2CY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-1937</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-1937</guid>
		<description>I just noticed a connection to &quot;Once in a Lifetime&quot; and ran with it, really. (And what people may think of that song&#039;s brilliance doesn&#039;t have much bearing on what they think of Byrne now; for the most part he&#039;s settled into his middle-class comfort character&#039;s shoes.) Anyway, I was basically just trolling there, and Erika&#039;s response was, I hope, just winkingly playing into trollbait. 

Still, there &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; something about gender going on here, I just don&#039;t know what it is. It&#039;s not really a class thing (which may have been the UK trump card when she was pretending to be an &quot;urchin&quot; or whatever; I never heard that myself), and it&#039;s definitely not a genre thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed a connection to &#8220;Once in a Lifetime&#8221; and ran with it, really. (And what people may think of that song&#8217;s brilliance doesn&#8217;t have much bearing on what they think of Byrne now; for the most part he&#8217;s settled into his middle-class comfort character&#8217;s shoes.) Anyway, I was basically just trolling there, and Erika&#8217;s response was, I hope, just winkingly playing into trollbait. </p>
<p>Still, there <i>is</i> something about gender going on here, I just don&#8217;t know what it is. It&#8217;s not really a class thing (which may have been the UK trump card when she was pretending to be an &#8220;urchin&#8221; or whatever; I never heard that myself), and it&#8217;s definitely not a genre thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Eddy</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-1926</guid>
		<description>A bunch of comments (mostly about comments):

1. I don&#039;t get what the people who think Lily&#039;s &quot;still not saying anything&quot; think she&#039;s supposed to be saying instead.

2. The person I used to be married to, reviewing Liz Phair&#039;s &quot;Fuck and Run&quot; in the fanzine &lt;i&gt;Radio On&lt;/i&gt; in the early &#039;90s, criticised it for seeming too moralistic.

3. I&#039;ll concede there are no doubt young women and under 30s and 22-year-olds (not to mention non-young men and over 30s and 44-year-olds) who share certain worries with the character in this song. But I&#039;m still bugged by the line about &quot;It&#039;s sad but true how society says her life is already over,&quot; since (as others have more or less pointed out above) &quot;society&quot; says no such thing, in this day and age of all days and ages. Lily might as well have said &quot;dominant culture,&quot; for God&#039;s sake. (But right, that doesn&#039;t mean some random individual might not &lt;i&gt;believe&lt;/i&gt; society says that, to pass the buck over to society if nothing else. And just &#039;cause the character believes it doesn&#039;t mean Lily does.)

4. We don&#039;t &quot;all&quot; know from the tabloids what Lily Allen has been going though, since some of us don&#039;t read the tabloids.

5. I don&#039;t get Dave&#039;s complaint about &quot;How come when David Byrne does it (couching existential dread in the face of banality in record-skipping cliches) it’s brilliant?&quot; Who the heck thinks David Byrne is brilliant anymore? Lily Allen does better in critics&#039; polls now than Byrne does. (I was setting Byrne up as a strawman against Boston at least uh 22 years ago, but at least then he was still placing high in Pazz &amp; Jop.)

6. I think it&#039;s funny how Eduardo thinks &quot;If Lily Allen were a man, she would not get acclaimed as a clever writer,&quot; but Erika (on Frank&#039;s blog page) says the reason David Byrne supposedly gets a free ride that Allen doesn&#039;t is &quot;because he&#039;s a BOY.&quot; I&#039;m not convinced either theory is right, though. (Randy Newman and Axl Rose are both the same gender, but critics used to be way more willing to read a distance into Newman&#039;s lyrics about race than Axl&#039;s. The difference, as far as I could tell back then, was one of class or genre. And that may well have changed since then, and maybe Axl didn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;deserve&lt;/i&gt; to have people read irony or detachment into his lyrics about race. But I&#039;m not sure whether that is remotely comparable to the issues being raised here, or not.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bunch of comments (mostly about comments):</p>
<p>1. I don&#8217;t get what the people who think Lily&#8217;s &#8220;still not saying anything&#8221; think she&#8217;s supposed to be saying instead.</p>
<p>2. The person I used to be married to, reviewing Liz Phair&#8217;s &#8220;Fuck and Run&#8221; in the fanzine <i>Radio On</i> in the early &#8217;90s, criticised it for seeming too moralistic.</p>
<p>3. I&#8217;ll concede there are no doubt young women and under 30s and 22-year-olds (not to mention non-young men and over 30s and 44-year-olds) who share certain worries with the character in this song. But I&#8217;m still bugged by the line about &#8220;It&#8217;s sad but true how society says her life is already over,&#8221; since (as others have more or less pointed out above) &#8220;society&#8221; says no such thing, in this day and age of all days and ages. Lily might as well have said &#8220;dominant culture,&#8221; for God&#8217;s sake. (But right, that doesn&#8217;t mean some random individual might not <i>believe</i> society says that, to pass the buck over to society if nothing else. And just &#8217;cause the character believes it doesn&#8217;t mean Lily does.)</p>
<p>4. We don&#8217;t &#8220;all&#8221; know from the tabloids what Lily Allen has been going though, since some of us don&#8217;t read the tabloids.</p>
<p>5. I don&#8217;t get Dave&#8217;s complaint about &#8220;How come when David Byrne does it (couching existential dread in the face of banality in record-skipping cliches) it’s brilliant?&#8221; Who the heck thinks David Byrne is brilliant anymore? Lily Allen does better in critics&#8217; polls now than Byrne does. (I was setting Byrne up as a strawman against Boston at least uh 22 years ago, but at least then he was still placing high in Pazz &amp; Jop.)</p>
<p>6. I think it&#8217;s funny how Eduardo thinks &#8220;If Lily Allen were a man, she would not get acclaimed as a clever writer,&#8221; but Erika (on Frank&#8217;s blog page) says the reason David Byrne supposedly gets a free ride that Allen doesn&#8217;t is &#8220;because he&#8217;s a BOY.&#8221; I&#8217;m not convinced either theory is right, though. (Randy Newman and Axl Rose are both the same gender, but critics used to be way more willing to read a distance into Newman&#8217;s lyrics about race than Axl&#8217;s. The difference, as far as I could tell back then, was one of class or genre. And that may well have changed since then, and maybe Axl didn&#8217;t <i>deserve</i> to have people read irony or detachment into his lyrics about race. But I&#8217;m not sure whether that is remotely comparable to the issues being raised here, or not.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edwardo</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>edwardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>I think Kat is onto something here - I don&#039;t mind bad lyrics, but Lily has such a tendency to jar, and to someone predisposed to uncharitable assumptions about her, it really can seem like she stuffs things in because she thinks they are VERY CLEVER (rhyming &quot;tesco&quot; with &quot;al fresco&quot;) or EDGY IN SOME WAY (lots of &quot;Alfie&quot;, &quot;Fuck You&quot;, that horrid one where she rhymes &quot;New Labour&quot; with &quot;neighbour&quot;) without any concern of whether it works with the melody, which can often torpedo her genuine gift for earworming. Unless you&#039;re in the Courtney Love/Neil Tennant echelon of skilled lyricists, you should first seek to do no harm. But Lily does harm, and I agree with Jonathan&#039;s blurb that her characterisations are shallow, and here it&#039;s annoying that she manages to wring a little bit of an interesting narrative and then just goes back to being glib before you can blink. If Lily Allen were a man, she would not get acclaimed as a clever writer. &lt;end sexism&gt; Her stylistic tics get in the way of her really getting to the heart of the points she&#039;s trying to make. I know lyrics are supposed to be read in different ways, but sometimes I get the feeling that people are reading things into Lily&#039;s scrawlings that aren&#039;t there - she&#039;s not as clever as you want her to be! As I said in my &quot;Not Fair&quot; blurb, she&#039;s not even wittier than Mike Skinner these days.

To me, the only times she&#039;s ever succeeded fully melodically are &quot;Knock &#039;Em Out&quot;, and also her cover of &quot;Don&#039;t Get Me Wrong&quot;, neither of which suffered from her petty crimes against scansion and general good sense. &quot;The Fear&quot; was close but suffered from the &quot;talking about/saying NOTHING&quot; problem she can&#039;t fight her way out of. I can really imagine liking &quot;22&quot; but there are too many clunkers getting in the way of the slight but appealing melody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Kat is onto something here &#8211; I don&#8217;t mind bad lyrics, but Lily has such a tendency to jar, and to someone predisposed to uncharitable assumptions about her, it really can seem like she stuffs things in because she thinks they are VERY CLEVER (rhyming &#8220;tesco&#8221; with &#8220;al fresco&#8221;) or EDGY IN SOME WAY (lots of &#8220;Alfie&#8221;, &#8220;Fuck You&#8221;, that horrid one where she rhymes &#8220;New Labour&#8221; with &#8220;neighbour&#8221;) without any concern of whether it works with the melody, which can often torpedo her genuine gift for earworming. Unless you&#8217;re in the Courtney Love/Neil Tennant echelon of skilled lyricists, you should first seek to do no harm. But Lily does harm, and I agree with Jonathan&#8217;s blurb that her characterisations are shallow, and here it&#8217;s annoying that she manages to wring a little bit of an interesting narrative and then just goes back to being glib before you can blink. If Lily Allen were a man, she would not get acclaimed as a clever writer. <end sexism> Her stylistic tics get in the way of her really getting to the heart of the points she&#8217;s trying to make. I know lyrics are supposed to be read in different ways, but sometimes I get the feeling that people are reading things into Lily&#8217;s scrawlings that aren&#8217;t there &#8211; she&#8217;s not as clever as you want her to be! As I said in my &#8220;Not Fair&#8221; blurb, she&#8217;s not even wittier than Mike Skinner these days.</p>
<p>To me, the only times she&#8217;s ever succeeded fully melodically are &#8220;Knock &#8216;Em Out&#8221;, and also her cover of &#8220;Don&#8217;t Get Me Wrong&#8221;, neither of which suffered from her petty crimes against scansion and general good sense. &#8220;The Fear&#8221; was close but suffered from the &#8220;talking about/saying NOTHING&#8221; problem she can&#8217;t fight her way out of. I can really imagine liking &#8220;22&#8243; but there are too many clunkers getting in the way of the slight but appealing melody.</end></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>&quot;but it is easy to believe, at 26, that you’ve missed your shot at whatever it is you could have been, and now you’re out of choices. Because — and that’s the point — at 22 you could have been anything, but at 26 you now are something.&quot;

^^^
This.  Erika, is as always, so fucking on point.  Except these days it&#039;s not even 26.  I&#039;m turning 22 in one month exactly, having just graduated college, and this existential malaise is vaguely present in most people I know.  &#039;The Fear&#039; of growing older and the future and closing doors and what it all means is very real, and very universal, I think, even if how it manifests itself in Lily/her portrayed character doesn&#039;t necessarily scan for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but it is easy to believe, at 26, that you’ve missed your shot at whatever it is you could have been, and now you’re out of choices. Because — and that’s the point — at 22 you could have been anything, but at 26 you now are something.&#8221;</p>
<p>^^^<br />
This.  Erika, is as always, so fucking on point.  Except these days it&#8217;s not even 26.  I&#8217;m turning 22 in one month exactly, having just graduated college, and this existential malaise is vaguely present in most people I know.  &#8216;The Fear&#8217; of growing older and the future and closing doors and what it all means is very real, and very universal, I think, even if how it manifests itself in Lily/her portrayed character doesn&#8217;t necessarily scan for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daavid</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>daavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>It seems like an odd choice for a single, not bad (except for the lyrics, which are a bit embarrassing)  but not nearly as good &quot;Chinese&quot; or even &quot;Everyone&#039;s At It&quot; either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like an odd choice for a single, not bad (except for the lyrics, which are a bit embarrassing)  but not nearly as good &#8220;Chinese&#8221; or even &#8220;Everyone&#8217;s At It&#8221; either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>Right, I&#039;ve had another listen. Weirdly, on an enjoyment level I prefer the banal cliches in the chorus because they scan better and don&#039;t really interfere with the melody (not because they compliment it but because there&#039;s hardly anything there to do the interfering!). The verse lyrics just seem really clumsy and obtrusive though - &#039;she gets one night stands&#039; is probably the worst culprit here. I dunno if that jarring effect is intentional, but in this case it&#039;s made me aware of a crap lyric I might have otherwise ignored (I am v forgiving of banal lyrics if they blend into the song well).  This problem crops up all over It&#039;s Not Me It&#039;s You - &#039;Everyone&#039;s At It&#039; could be a brilliant piece of snark-pop but it&#039;s spoiled by massive stand-out clangers like &#039;but kids are in danger!&#039;. Fvck&#039;s sake dude, this isn&#039;t Torchwood.

The lyrics to &#039;The Fear&#039; on the other hand (which I love) are just right: &#039;i heard people die while they&#039;re trying to find &#039;em&#039; fits in so well with the tune that it steers clear of any potentially dodgy ground. Plus the general theme of bewildered paranoia matches the murky synth bibble brilliantly. Alas &#039;22&#039; has more of a Suggs B-side vibe which is not really the ideal background for any sort of social commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, I&#8217;ve had another listen. Weirdly, on an enjoyment level I prefer the banal cliches in the chorus because they scan better and don&#8217;t really interfere with the melody (not because they compliment it but because there&#8217;s hardly anything there to do the interfering!). The verse lyrics just seem really clumsy and obtrusive though &#8211; &#8217;she gets one night stands&#8217; is probably the worst culprit here. I dunno if that jarring effect is intentional, but in this case it&#8217;s made me aware of a crap lyric I might have otherwise ignored (I am v forgiving of banal lyrics if they blend into the song well).  This problem crops up all over It&#8217;s Not Me It&#8217;s You &#8211; &#8216;Everyone&#8217;s At It&#8217; could be a brilliant piece of snark-pop but it&#8217;s spoiled by massive stand-out clangers like &#8216;but kids are in danger!&#8217;. Fvck&#8217;s sake dude, this isn&#8217;t Torchwood.</p>
<p>The lyrics to &#8216;The Fear&#8217; on the other hand (which I love) are just right: &#8216;i heard people die while they&#8217;re trying to find &#8216;em&#8217; fits in so well with the tune that it steers clear of any potentially dodgy ground. Plus the general theme of bewildered paranoia matches the murky synth bibble brilliantly. Alas &#8216;22&#8242; has more of a Suggs B-side vibe which is not really the ideal background for any sort of social commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matias H</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-1885</link>
		<dc:creator>Matias H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-1885</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s sort of funny that she&#039;s the new Chanel girl.

http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z67/designscene/designscenealbum/LilyAllenforChanelBagsbyKarlLage-3.jpg

http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z67/designscene/designscenealbum/LilyAllenforChanelBagsbyKarlLage-4.jpg

Looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sort of funny that she&#8217;s the new Chanel girl.</p>
<p><a href="http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z67/designscene/designscenealbum/LilyAllenforChanelBagsbyKarlLage-3.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z67/designscene/designscenealbum/LilyAllenforChanelBagsbyKarlLage-3.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z67/designscene/designscenealbum/LilyAllenforChanelBagsbyKarlLage-4.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z67/designscene/designscenealbum/LilyAllenforChanelBagsbyKarlLage-4.jpg</a></p>
<p>Looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098&#038;cpage=1#comment-1883</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 09:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesinglesjukebox.com/?p=1098#comment-1883</guid>
		<description>Argh my last couple of sentences about the career didn&#039;t really get across what I was trying to say (was typing in a hurry as had to leave the office and get to Poptimism!). I will have another listen to the song and try and pick a better example of how Lily&#039;s selling herself short &amp; could do much better - that was the only line I could remember that I didn&#039;t like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh my last couple of sentences about the career didn&#8217;t really get across what I was trying to say (was typing in a hurry as had to leave the office and get to Poptimism!). I will have another listen to the song and try and pick a better example of how Lily&#8217;s selling herself short &amp; could do much better &#8211; that was the only line I could remember that I didn&#8217;t like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
