The Singles Jukebox

Pop, to two decimal places.

Month: May 2014

  • Jazmine Sullivan ft. Meek Mill – Dumb

    How the Meek have fallen.


    [Video][Website]
    [5.88]

    Iain Mew: I love the combination of massive choral vocal and more subtle beat, which makes the whole song feel like it’s skipping around and between the footsteps of a giant. Jazmine and Meek Mill play their argument competently and down the middle enough to pick up both some of the drama and some of the agility.
    [7]

    Daniel Montesinos-Donaghy: Vengeful choirs, martial drums and biting accusations flood “Dumb” without ever awakening the heart. It’s a puzzle to allow two emotional foghorns like Sullivan and Meek into the same space and come out with something this… controlled.
    [4]

    Alfred Soto: A characteristically sharp Meek performance compensates for the lethargic string sample, and Sullivan tries too hard. Not dumb but ambitious.
    [5]

    Brad Shoup: Pairing that chant with those wet-newspaper snares isn’t the smartest move either.
    [4]

    Megan Harrington: Why, oh why, did some clumsy label exec decide to ruin this sinewy anthem with 30 weak seconds from Meek Mill? 
    [8]

    Thomas Inskeep: Jazmine Sullivan is a decent singer, if a bit too scratchy-voiced for her own good, but there’s no song here, and Meek Mill is a half-decent rapper at best. I need never be bothered with this again. 
    [4]

    Andy Hutchins: If Key Wane had a producer tag, his stature would match his streak of excellent singles. “Dumb,” which comes equipped with subterranean bass, a choppy drum run, and scene-setting operatic background vocals, is just the latest. I suppose Jazmine Sullivan (who is back!) is pretty good here, and Meek proves quite capable on a rare R&B guest verse; the beat is the show, and I’d rate an instrumental even higher.
    [7]

    David Lee: I forgot how good Jazmine is at wounded. Even the insult is defensive, a means of telling herself that he’s the dumb one, not her. But then, the slowed down “Jesus Walks” renders Meek Mill–Meek Mill!– the lone fool arguing to a regiment of Jazmines who know his shtick. “Dumb” explodes the ambiguity of “We Need A Resolution” in spectacular fashion.
    [8]

  • Nico & Vinz – Am I Wrong

    Don’t answer that.


    [Video][Website]
    [5.30]
    Thomas Inskeep: I can certainly see why this is catching on in the U.S.: it’s like the likes of Tiesto actually wrote a pure pop song. And that looped guitar figure is insanely earwormy. That said, the singer (Nico? Vinz?) sounds waaaaay too much like the dude from the Outfield at a karaoke bar. We sure this isn’t just the Outfield with an EDM makeover pulling a fast one on us?
    [4]

    Brad Shoup: If they were afraid of not sounding uncommitted, then no worries: that brass is flat like month-old soda, and I can’t remember the last I heard such grim handclaps. Yet another fretful guitar-figure/existentialism combo… what an odd trend.
    [4]

    Alfred Soto: That rubberband of a riff would have made the song a winner by itself, and those swelling “Sledgehammer”/Al Green horns sound like someone knows how to mix them. The vocal’s too open-throaty sincere. Imagine Ryan Tedder singing over the arrangement of his life. Which explains why it’s in the American top twenty.
    [5]

    Stephen Thomas Erlewine: I dig this. It’s a shameless copy of Bruno Mars’ shameless copying of The Police, but Nico & Vinz get everything right: a shimmering, arpeggiated guitar line decidedly simpler than anything Andy Summers would play, balanced by a keening vocal somewhat simpler than Sting. What matters is the chorus and the feel, both of which are so appealing they make the verse seem stronger than it is, but the shakiness of that verse dissipates because of the vibe. This is a summer song through and through, a record that creates the impression that magic hour–the moment when the sun threatens to sink into horizon–will never end.
    [8]

    Anthony Easton: I like the doubling of “wrong” here, and how the middle sounds fractured, so the doubling becomes a mirror.
    [4]

    Scott Mildenhall: It isn’t really either, but “Am I Wrong” falls on the hitmaking convergence of Mumford stomp and deep house. The line you can draw from this to “Waves” splits off to “Sonnentanz” as much as “Counting Stars”. They all fit on a diagram of hits – alongside songs like “Look Right Through”, “What I Might Do”, “One Day/Reckoning Song” and “Somebody That I Used To Know” – that all on some level trade on a kind of “earthiness”. Sparse solemnity from sad men strumming/on a saxophone, the main variable being level of danceability. On that front this falls closer to “Changes” than “Brutal Hearts”, but that still doesn’t make it quite as interesting as wildly theorising about it. Tenner bet Mumford & Sons record a haunting Colonel Abrams cover before Christmas.
    [6]

    Will Adams: Pleasant worldbeat featuring two emotive but nondescript, plaintive men, that unfortunately suffers from a bridge that invokes that old, “…then I don’t wanna be right” cliché. Never have I been so confident that a song is destined to be a one-hit wonder.
    [6]

    Katherine St Asaph: “Am I tripping for having a vision?” “Am I wrong for thinking out the box from where I stay?” Yes. You’re wrong. You’re wrong, for thinking this Bruno Mars / fun. / Stargate puree, these A&R ChickieNobs, this supposedly inspirational text that when it starts being about a girl (“that we could be something for real”) veers disconcertingly close to the Elliot Rodgers manifesto, is thinking outside any box. For one, can we get a chart-underdog-makes-good that actually makes good?
    [1]

    Andy Hutchins: “Am I Wrong” is one of my favorite songs of 2014, but it wasn’t until seeing the gorgeous, warm-toned, sub-Saharan-set video — something I will guess lots of kids who Shazam it (like I did) do for their second listen — that I got it: It’s no less than a perfect summer song. On first listen, it felt like be a pretty simple song about the girl just beyond the singer(s)’s reach; it’s really a semi-biographical song about two African-Norwegians reaching to the great wide something for stardom, and being absolutely sure that their arms are long enough to do so. It’s also suffused with a different kind of warmth than I feel from even the hotter signals from DJ Mustard’s increasingly massive orbit: The drums, claps, and the “Oh ya ya ya ye” in the second hook are familiarly African, and flesh out what would otherwise be pretty generic guitar-and-horns production, while the vocals sound like, as this guy noted, Sting crossed with Akon — something I couldn’t find on another song in rotation with a week to search. Warm, hopeful songs about going somewhere and doing something are my summer songs, and this will be one of many for me in the hot months of 2014. It may be late-coming over here in the States, given that it simmered in the summer of 2013 for the rest of the world, but it still arrived on time.
    [9]

    David Lee: Reminiscent of 2007 in its Akon vox and its Ryan Tedder songwriting. Luckily, the production is many more generations removed from “Take Me Home Tonight;” anything closer to the original would have sentenced this to total, deadening self-seriousness.
    [6]

  • Sara Bareilles – I Choose You

    I’m unsure we do.


    [Video][Website]
    [4.80]

    Rebecca A. Gowns: Back in high school, I loved Sara Bareilles’ debut, “Careful Confessions.” I liked her for her winks — sure, she was making generic coffeehouse rock, but she had a sparkle. She was following a model, but was still spontaneous and spunky, like a polished Regina Spektor, or a more jazz-influenced Sheryl Crow. This song is an unfortunate single when compared to that early promise of potential. It’s still better than most commercial-filler songs; her voice is still warm, bright, and friendly. And at least it’s a step up from “Brave” (which may have very well been improved by Katy Perry’s “Roar“). Ultimately, it’s the production that fails her, every time. “I Choose You” sounds so tinny and overworked, like a twee “Soak Up the Sun,” or a Regina Spektor song boiled down to 15-second jingle. (And it goes on for over 3 minutes!) Pining for authenticity is for chumps, yet I can’t help but crave for a new single from Sara Bareilles that’s just her plunking away at a piano and trilling at coffeehouse patrons.
    [4]

    Crystal Leww: I don’t even know.
    [5]

    Alfred Soto: The point at which the pizzicato and Bareilles, mixed to sound as if singing behind the Pyrenees, negotiate for space is lovely and unexpected. A triumph of arrangement over songwriting.
    [6]

    Patrick St. Michel: Designed for a goopy wedding-proposal-YouTube-video, except you can’t even switch to another tab and just ignore the clip.
    [1]

    Anthony Easton: I would like more narrative economy and less flourishes on the production here. 
    [6]

    Stephen Thomas Erlewine: Not enough musicians attempt the kind of soft rock that’s Sara Bareilles’ speciality–so expertly sculpted, it makes more of an impact upon its tenth listen than it does on the first. This is especially true of her quieter numbers, of which “I Choose You” is one. I prefer her sprightlier moments–so much so, I failed to cite “I Choose You” when I reviewed (and praised) The Blessed Unrest back in the summer of 2013, and failed to remember it by title nearly a year later–but isolated from the album, this feels sweetly ingratiating, as it moves from seeming merely pleasant to something quite soothing.
    [6]

    Brad Shoup: The plucks make this too jittery for a slow dance, but overall it’s too smooth, and more of a pogo. So it’s another track built for the car: spangly and tuneful, a rhythm to tap fingers to and a carefully balanced mix.
    [7]

    Megan Harrington: (♫ IIIII ooooo / I choooose you, bay-bay ♫) Sorry, Sara, but I choose Wille Hatch. 
    [5]

    Katherine St Asaph: Sara Bareilles is frustrating; she’s so innocuous and hard to hate, but market trends have weaponized her brand of innocuous music to crowd out other, more daring female singer-songwriters from pop. This doesn’t even trickle down to more than a few people who do sound like Bareilles; of Bareilles’ Hotel Cafe colleagues, Sierra Swan and Charlotte Martin, and countless others launch a thousand Kickstarters unnoticed. Like “Brave,” “I Choose You” is well-crafted but anodyne — with the stutterbeat and repeated flutters, it’s kind of like a remix of “I Knew You Were Trouble” aimed at adult-hits stations (and Pokemon lyrics videos, and viral glurge juggernauts.) It’s hard not to want it to do well. I just wish it weren’t symptomatic.
    [5]

    Will Adams: I don’t like the idea of choosing or picking someone to be in love with. It implies that there’s an ultimatum at play, that there was some police line-up that only presented six options from which to decide a man to spend the rest of your life with. It doesn’t imply true love, much as the saccharine, staccato strings and light drum machines would like to.
    [3]

  • Kevin Gates – Arm & Hammer

    NB: NOT A SPONSORED POST


    [Video][Website]
    [5.33]

    Megan Harrington: Kevin Gates is a good rapper with satisfying instincts where his delivery is concerned, but he refuses to broaden his production beyond trap. “Arm & Hammer” isn’t bad, but it is boring, very much in spite of Gates. Thanks to Beyoncé, minimalist trap drums and tense crooning sound cutting edge. Here, they’re closer to the ingredients for cake than the ingredients for crack. 
    [5]

    Alfred Soto: Not as startling as “4:30 A.M.” but I’m a sucker for his pained gravelly timbre and organ when it’s mixed as well as it is here. Plus, sandwich bags, Arm & Hammer and scales make their debut in a hip-hop song.
    [7]

    Edward Okulicz: That grainy, angry organ is terrific; imagine a trap “We Found Love” played at 33 rpm. Gates, too, sounds grainy and angry. Not quite as angry as if, say, he’d just been given a shipment of actual Arm & Hammer instead of coke, but numbly menacing. It does rather feel like a good bit of gritty scene-setting that doesn’t go much further, though.
    [5]

    Daniel Montesinos-Donaghy: Gates has an amazing bark, like how you imagine an elevator would sound like when it whirrs out of control. A real 0-200 growl. This is one of these songs about making and selling drugs, and Gates has better versions of those songs. But that voice, man.
    [6]

    Brad Shoup: The organ bit, delicate and deliberate, could score a demonic baseball rally. Gates has voices, and he’s got details — the congratulations bit is awesome, and even the cell conversation in the hook hides a grin. Everything about the weight’s pretty standard, but I feel like he’s doing what he can to remedy that.
    [7]

    Juana Giaimo: Everything has a limit, and I think this is the one for cocaine metaphors.
    [2]

  • Lil Wayne ft. Drake – Believe Me

    “It was that controversial? Damn. How can we get those kinds of numbers?”


    [Video][Website]
    [5.44]

    Katherine St Asaph: When did Wayne redevelop a pulse?
    [7]

    Daniel Montesinos-Donaghy: On TV last night, there was an hour of music channel programming entitled “10 Years of Young Money!” And goddamn, that’s one anniversary I didn’t see coming, especially seeing as it’s wrong (that anniversary will be next year). Everything about Young Money seems nigh-on ridiculous when you consider how many things had to go right for the faction to sit atop the rap mainstream: the one remaining rapper of the classic Cash Money lineup needed to become a star while he mutated into some Jim Morrison goblin, then develop a platform to launch an ex soap-opera actor and a drama nerd as hip-hop’s new stars, as well as give Lil Twist a way to become part of Bieber’s squadron. Weirder things have happened, but Young Money’s commercial rise is plenty weird. Weirder still is that this bucks the trend of Wayne’s eye-crust-level recent material. This slaps, with quotables for days and shout-outs alike to Noreaga and Niall Horan. Maybe that anniversary will be worth a true coronation next year.
    [7]

    Alfred Soto: Skip ahead 90 seconds, way past Fucking Drake’s introspection-as-pounce (i.e. I’ll show you my heart, you show me your breasts). Get to Wayne, at his best when he as usual he loses his place in a narrative and free associates.
    [6]

    Anthony Easton: I could take or leave the rest of the track, but the steely, isolating, almost austere metronome-like bit near the very end — intimidating and difficult, and as good as anything on Sonic Youth’s Goodbye 20th Century — I want more that sounds like that. I want more that sounds so isolating.
    [6]

    Megan Harrington: Drake is playing that trick where you bury a lie in a haystack of truth; don’t believe him. Young Thug, Lil Silk, even Rich Homie Quan have lapped Wayne. It’s exhausting simply listening to this song, flinching at every labored over line and cringing at every sloppy bar. These two couldn’t be more anxious for the bell to ring.
    [3]

    Crystal Leww: Lil Wayne hasn’t sounded this good or rapped with this much agency in years (yeah, low bar, I know). Drake has never sounded this much like a dead fish.
    [5]

    Brad Shoup: Weezy sounds great! He’s not cackling or ingratiating; he’s just mean. Unless you’re Mahbod Moghadam, though, Drake’s prose isn’t anything special, just a lot of huffing around the same line endings. Love the fifty-dollar beat, which remains just as boring at half the speed. Though at one-sixteenth, it’s downright doomy.
    [4]

    Patrick St. Michel: Considering that Lil Wayne’s gone and released a far better song following this plodding number, the only element here of any interest is Drake saying he does “One Direction numbers.”
    [3]

    David Turner: You haven’t had your hair cut in weeks. Your mom notices that your skin has actually acquired a tan. The A/C for your car is just rolling down the front windows. But none of that means it’s summer until Drizzy says so. Though it’s Lil Wayne’s opening single, Drake is the nigga commanding to “Believe Me.” But I’ve believed Drake since he noted we’re all on one and my summer circumstances haven’t changed much, believe me. 
    [8]

  • John Walt – Kemo Walk

    Going harder than winter in Chicago…


    [Video][Website]
    [5.83]

    Daniel Montesinos-Donaghy: Some words typed down while listening to “Kemo Walk”: aquatic mollywater bop slow-motion beautiful loss tension Boards of Canada Bop of Canada play this for hours it’s a shame for your loss dipped my head in a foxhole Matmos makes rap beats now may this never end.
    [9]

    David Turner: John Walt’s “Kemo Walk” is a very blunted take on Chicago’s usually hyperactive Bop music. Not a bad direction to take the style, but maybe it is the slowed-up melody of “Drop That Nae Nae” that makes this not quite as memorable as Sikko Mob’s “Fiesta” or DLow’s “DLow Shuffle.” 
    [6]

    Crystal Leww: The mixing on this is horrendous, but that’s to be expected from a mixtape track that’s been forced into the role of single. John Walt sort of just glides over this beat without engaging in it, but that’s also to be expected given that this is just grabbed, sloppily, from “Drop That Nae Nae.” The most surprising part of “Kemo Walk” is that it’s not a bop track at all despite ripping the name from Chicago’s Bop King (I mean, you can force the issue, as they do in the video), but rather just some Autotuned flurries over the now canonized Nae Nae beat. A more valiant effort and better introduction to Walt on something smooth would be “Touchdown,” featuring the wonderful Noname Gypsy and produced by his favorite producer Saba, and a better introduction to bop would be DJ Moondawg’s tape. “Kemo Walk” should have remained an interesting experiment in the studio.
    [2]

    Anthony Easton: As slight and as decorative as plastic grass, like that stuff you get in take-out sushi. 
    [3]

    Alfred Soto: Melancholy mushmouth, with aqueous synths and “Bitch, you’re super sorry” sung affectionately.
    [6]

    Mallory O’Donnell: “Kemo Walk” is pure Blade Runner futurism, musically, lyrically and sexually — gritty, dystopian and slightly uncertain. Definitely amoral. It’s also DJ Screw and Ron Hardy, Eazy-E and Blowfly, Redd Foxx and DJ Assault. How much you can look past lyrics like that one lyric or that other one in favor of “run shit/like forest” and “order soup or salad” really depends on how you slice them — bizarre junk poetry taunts or just more classic misogyny? — and what you slice them with; that knife is really, really sharp.
    [7]

    Patrick St. Michel: If The Knife circa Silent Shout offered up the soundtrack for a could-be dance craze, they’d end up with “Kemo Walk.” It sounds like it’s frosted over, the music seemingly moving at half speed save for the drilling percussion. John Walt sounds like he’s rapping through a Chicago snowstorm, his voice obscured but still coming through just enough. It’s chilly, but what makes “Kemo Walk” great is that this iced-over sound still feeds into a totally joyful number, one anchored by the glorious fuck-off taunt “it’s a shame for your loss.”
    [9]

    Brad Shoup: The track, small as it is, feels a bit back-heavy, as Walt barrels through that gorgeous goopiness straight to the abrupt end, picking at the same slight melody. Still, a marriage of Future and Arthur Russell is worth a bunch of spins.
    [6]

    Megan Harrington: That lazy, slow drill delivery is too literal when combined with dreamy, spacey, cloud production. “Kemo Walk” is no handholds, all ether. 
    [6]

    David Lee:Running“‘s atmosphere let loose over the cold waters of Lake Michigan in the winter. Which makes for a song of icy vapors that nevertheless carry with them a vague danceability. John Walt’s pacing, as giddy and loose as the regional dance phenom anchoring this song, helps in that regard. But then that’s him being used as an instrument — or woozy metronome — in the able hands of DJ Damnage, and not as a distinct human presence.
    [6]

    Scott Mildenhall: It’s for the best this was kept as short as it is, because any longer and it would have begun to drag. What becomes hypnotic at two minutes — the disinterested braggadocio of the hook and Walt’s voice beginning to seem to just meld into the beat — can get soporific at three, or four, or five.
    [5]

    Katherine St Asaph: Wildly poor-context comparison time: Autotune scatters over these slippery-ice synths — ones parts that aren’t “Drop That Nae Nae,” that is — remind me of Poliça. It’s a cool idea, and not much more than that.
    [5]

  • Exo-K – Overdose

    From concept to concept…


    [Video][Website]
    [5.89]

    Madeleine Lee: Over the past two years, EXO’s singles have been a whirlwind tour of different identities as the group struggled to find its own. They’ve been a DBSK reboot (your own lawsuit joke goes here); they’ve been rap-step; they’ve been Blackstreet, to the most (and most deserved) success. “Overdose” is, at last, a single that sounds like something they’ve done before, and this is not a bad thing, because what it recalls are some of their strongest album tracks: Mama‘s “Machine” with the chorus and raps, XOXO‘s “Heart Attack” and “Black Pearl” for the melodies and beats. The Korean subgroup’s vocalists are shouters, not crooners, and the song accepts this as a strength, so that even that wonky note in the chorus sounds convincing when barked aggressively enough. I’m not sure how I’ll react if the next single sounds like this, or the next three singles, but for now, I’m glad the group is returning to its own catalogue, not trying to emulate someone else’s.
    [7]

    Patrick St. Michel: The concept of “Overdose” is played out, the ol’ love-as-drug-you’re-addicted-to metaphor that was never interesting to begin with. Yet there’s no sweetness to Exo-K’s version, and bless them for that. The brostep elements dig in like dentist drills, and the beat hits hard. The singing doesn’t quite match up with the hard-hitting movements around it, but this “Overdose” is far more aggressive than what I expected going in.
    [7]

    Jessica Doyle: If you wanted to throw out the potential camp of “Wolf” and just keep the stadium-suitable shouting, then “Overdose” is here for you. There’s even a bit of earworm smarts in that oh she waaaaants me, oh she’s gooooot me, a wink worth sticking with. But there’s no intimacy. (Compare to B1A4’s “Lonely” or MBLAQ’s underrated “Be a Man” before you start assuming that Korean audiences want maximalism now and maximalism forever.) To get at all the emotion EXO inspires you have to push past the music and get to the community built on GIFs, variety-show outtakes, in-jokes, and, most recently, sadness and accusations of betrayal. Kris, the one who’s suing to get out, is part of EXO’s Mandarin-singing half, but as far as the community’s concerned, it doesn’t matter: this is supposed to be a group effort on an epic, border-smashing level. And as far as the music’s concerned, it doesn’t matter either: it could be any half-dozen voices squeezed into the allowable space.
    [5]

    Edward Okulicz: A song that’s stuffed full of sounds and voices and tics yet still captures none of the sense of urgency you might expect from a song called “Overdose.” Not that such a song need be fast, but this one’s just too blank in the verses and fussy and fidgety everywhere else to evoke the idea of a dangerous reaction to some girl’s love. Overdosing isn’t really comparable to accidentally tripping over your own feet, you know? Also, if you care about such things, while Chen is still too cute for his own good, the M version is only slightly better because of a superior slow-menace-rap bit.
    [4]

    Sonya Nicholson: “One member down, ten more to go before I can debut as a solo singer,” Chen/D.O. thought, while trying to complete a difficult gymnastic maneuver on less than an hour of sleep.  
    [7]

    Scott Mildenhall: They’ve taken one cue from Labrinth (they’ve stolen his cue, basically), but they haven’t paid heed to his advice on clarity (via Rami Yacoub, via Max Martin, via Denniz Pop). There are nice elements like the kindred chorus vworping and actually Rami-esque foghorn, but they don’t make the direction of the song any less aimless, a problem reflected in the the noticeably vacillatory bilingualism.
    [5]

    Daniel Montesinos-Donaghy: One of the wonderful things about the music industry’s rapid globalisation is the way that workmanlike producers find their niches outside of their own country. Away from the heavily-A&R’d merging of Missy and G-Dragon, Snoop and 2NE1, Snoop and Girls Generation — hell, Snoop and the whole world — there’s the folk behind-the-scenes, plugging their songs, selling the publishing, making moves outside of the US. (Rarely does pop feel like it could inspire an Olivier Assayas film, but this is one of those rare circumstances.) “Overdose” is a showcase for The Underdogs, a production team with the expected Chris Brown/Omarion credits that all American R&B journeymen seem to have. Perhaps in the US there are less vocal groups to use as battering rams, to bulk up and attack when the song demands. This is when Exo’s comically ginormous rank comes in handy – there’s so much song to be filled, and there’s enough members to do the job. Points deducted for the frowny-face emoji rap verse, as always is the case.
    [7]

    Brad Shoup: The track doesn’t offer much reinforcement, just a thin synth barrier, and no one’s dissatisfied with being wallpaper. The chorus is mostly those boy-band and-here’s-the-moral chords; they tie an elegant knot but immediately undo it.
    [6]

    Mallory O’Donnell: Too much growl, not enough prowl.
    [5]

  • Linkin Park ft. Rakim – Guilty All the Same

    Want to feel old? Linkin Park… premiered their single on Shazam.


    [Video][Website]
    [3.09]

    Anthony Easton: I no longer miss the 1990s. 
    [2]

    Daniel Montesinos-Donaghy: Phew, a lot going on here: “Guilty” shifts from garage-metal to Eurometal glory to commercial thrash to industrial flourishes to goth-drama. It’s not unusual for Linkin Park to run through as many attempts at eclecticism, seeing as they came from a hacky mash-up scene in the first place and have settled into making weird art-metal since the start of this decade. “Guilty” is a welcome crunch, sure to work best in the context of the upcoming Hunting Party album, but it’s almost comically overstuffed. Example: Rakim is here, guys! Remember the last time he was this close to the sphere of commercial music and was signed to Aftermath Records? Is this what could have happened with the God in the nu-metal wild early-noughties? Is this the darkest timeline?
    [6]

    Mallory O’Donnell: Killer riff, pity it’s stuck in this song from 1998. It would be interesting to see what some musicians that are living today would have done with it.
    [3]

    Patrick St. Michel: This collaboration would have made sense, and would have made someone really rich, in 2002, when Linkin Park were at the peak of their Toonami-fueled, no-you-shut-up-dad hybridization of rock, rap and electronic music. There is plenty to dislike about Linkin Park — especially when one has shed all traces of goofy angry-teenager-dom — but back then they did what they did perfectly: every guitar stab and record scratch had its place, and even if Chester Bennington’s words were wince-worthy, it was never awkward. That Jay-Z/Linkin Park mashup EP didn’t fail because the rap sounded out of place over Linkin Park’s music. So in theory, Rakim should slide into these dude’s music — except Linkin Park realized a Transformers soundtrack appearance won’t build an extra floor on their homes, so they aim for the festival stages of the world by… sounding like Muse. And “Guilty All the Same” is too all-over-the-place and interested in being complex to find adequate space for Rakim, his inclusion as forced as it can get.
    [2]

    David Turner: The joke of the name “nu-metal” was that it wasn’t ever very metal, but “Guilty All the Same” is a step too metal. I haven’t kept up with the band since 2007, but doubling down and just becoming an angsty metal band is not the path I’d have chosen. But Rakim appears here, so who knows where your career will take you. 
    [3]

    Andy Hutchins: I have precisely zero valuable or interesting thoughts on Linkin Park getting “harder” or whatever in their 18th year of existence — cool, dudes, you are playing your guitars more vigorously than you previously did — but Rakim being on a No. 1 song (and likely being the oldest rapper ever to appear on a No. 1 song) in 2014, 27 years after Paid in Full, is endlessly fascinating to me, because a) Mike Shinoda’s enough of a traditionalist dweeb (I say this out of personal recognition and love) to idolize and reach out to Rakim, something anyone who bought the Fort Minor album knew well and b) because he’s still leagues better than many, many rappers from a technical standpoint. He’s locked in here, latticing his old-head-talks-about-the-game verse over a bridge of stabbing riffery, the sort of tricky stuff that 90 percent of the up-and-coming generation of rap has eschewed to the point of that style’s growing endangerment. When Kendrick Lamar is hailed as a savior of rap, as Jay Electronica or J. Cole or any number of meticulous, traditionalist rappers were before, it is often by either old heads who remember Rakim and the revolution that followed him, or kids ensnared by imagined nostalgia, and both of those groups are more pernicious to the growth and progression of rap as a genre and a style. But they do have a point, if they choose to make a granular one: Few rappers have ever crafted verses as expertly as Rakim, and they really don’t make ’em like Rakim did — and does — anymore.
    [5]

    Alfred Soto: Guilty of changing nary a note nor approach since the Clinton years. Same goes for Linkin Park.
    [2]

    Thomas Inskeep: I expected this to be bad, but I didn’t expect it to sound like the worst mid-’80s Teutonic metal. It’s like Linkin Park featuring Yngwie Malmsteen. Actually, I take that back; that’s an insult to Yngwie Malmsteen.
    [0]

    Katherine St Asaph: One truth, one lie: Mike Shinoda was inspired to write this while “listening to a lot of indie music“; he tweaked the riff from a Donkey Kong remix. And one basic miscalculation: At this point in Linkin Park’s career and skills, the prospect of a new Shinoda — even if it’s temporary Rakim — is far less enticing than that of a new Chester. Particularly when the TRVV MVTVL just strands him like this.
    [4]

    Megan Harrington: At best, this sounds like a cheap Danger Mouse rehash for Rakim to go soft over. At worst, this is a flailing dirge over which grown men pout like teenagers. There is maybe a one-point difference between the two outcomes, which I split. 
    [3]

    Brad Shoup: Please feel for Linkin Park, who had access to all these entry points o’ rage, but still had to justify an investment. They nod to hardcore, black metal and NWOBHM, but the takeaway gesture is nu-EDM. Oddly, depressingly, Rakim — THE GOD — conjures the klassic sound with a dead-on Shinoda impression. Thank God this lasts so long; the embarrassment diffuses.
    [4]

  • Nicki Minaj – Pills N Potions

    Coming in with the exact amount of controversy you expected…


    [Video][Website]
    [5.20]
    Patrick St. Michel: Nicki Minaj has established she’s capable of variety, and also capable of doing a lot of things very well. She routinely steals the spotlight from other rappers on their songs, and she’s a great pop star (hi, I think “Starships” is great, thanks for listening). “Pills N Potions” shows she can deliver a perfectly fine heartbreak anthem — and hey, those rap bits are good, the best parts of the song. But Minaj can’t make this more than a slow-lane, lighters-in-the-air ballad, despite doing better than most could have.
    [5]

    Alfred Soto: Self-help ‘n’ singing.
    [4]

    Andy Hutchins: This is the mature, honest, conflicted countermove to the swoon of “Super Bass” that Nicki was probably destined to make someday, and it’s a song that only she could make. Only a few artists would command an Ester Dean co-write this good and a Dr. Luke/Cirkut production that is at turns regal (those drums!) and wistful (that tambourine, and the synth in the hook) without ever stealing the show from her or flattening her, as David Guetta once did — and none of the other candidates are rappers. Only Nicki and Drake, among rappers, could inflect this hook perfectly, calibrating a balance between proud and plaintive; it’s easy to forget Nicki can sing, if all you want her to do is rap, but she’s always been able to. And of those two, only Nicki, not her more self-consumed little brother, could be generous enough to devote her first single to mixed feelings about a former friend/lover/something. While I’m generally cynical about the modern revival of the old-as-popular-music-itself trend of trolling listeners with personal songs that invite speculation about the unnamed figures, especially as Mssrs. Swift and Graham play the game more expertly than ever, Nicki’s never been particularly public with her relationship(s). Safaree showing up in “Super Bass” was an Easter egg, not the point of the video. And Nicki’s broken so far out of the mold of the young man’s game that is most rap that she can make a song like this, and songs like the brilliant, poppy second half of Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded, without much more than nominal pushback than the concern trolling from the Peter Rosenbergs of the world. Nicki is grown (she’s 31 and has been rapping professionally for 10 years now), and Nicki is invulnerable enough to be vulnerable, and Nicki is rapping about as well as one can rap for this kind of track on this track (“Benzy”/”envy”/”frenzy” is superb low-key internal rhyme; “But I: Still don’t wish death on ’em, I just reflect on ’em” is a great line). She contains multitudes; we are lucky to live in her time and ought to appreciate all of them.
    [9]

    Mallory O’Donnell: Not only is Nicki Minaj more talented, successful and hotter than you but ALSO SHE IS MORE FORGIVING.
    [2]

    Thomas Inskeep: Nicki Minaj: great on hip-hop songs, awful on pop songs — especially her own. After the adrenaline rush of “Lookin’ Ass Nigga,” I was dearly hoping for a hard hip-hop record from Minaj, but she’s clearly decided the money is more important than her art.
    [0]

    Katherine St Asaph: Peter Rosenberg is full of shit. The bros who think Nicki Minaj is a metonym for bad music taste — the kind of guys who comment on Clockwork Orange videos suggesting the Nazi footage be replaced with “Stupid Hoe” — are full of more shit, and as much as they insinuate their problem is with rap, their problem is actually with pop. (Specifically, with “downmarket” pop, which prompts an entire digression on race and class and cred and neon hair, the tl;dr of which is screw the Taste Olympics.) But “Starships” still sucks. It would be such a triumph if only it didn’t suck. I don’t know when or why critics decided it didn’t suck, or made it so damn symbolic. It’s not the music — if it were, people would have canonized even one other RedOne production from 2012 onward, and Ester Dean would be a star. It’s not Nicki’s indelible presence, because indelible presences on RedOne tracks often come off like ink bleed on a photocopy. “Starships” began as, and was written to aspire to, a Mohombi track; Nicki’s added value was bringing the guest rap in-house. Is it literally just that Nicki has made a pop song, whichever ol’ pop song, and that people who don’t like pop don’t like it? Rap bros don’t even care; it’s imagining points onto a scoreboard the other side is pissing on. “Pills N Potions” sucks less than “Starships,” but it sucks more drowsily, which is exactly what you’d expect from Dr. Luke and Cirkut giving Nicki a lighters ballad. I didn’t like this either when it was called “Adore You” or “Battle Cry,” or for that matter “Marilyn Monroe” or “Fly.” In theory I don’t begrudge people their pop crossovers, not in this music economy. I want Nicki Minaj to be a star, and have since her still-astonishing “Roman Holiday” at the Grammys — which would have been iconic if Nicki got iconic songs. Instead, she got Sia with drug metaphors, and got predictable.
    [2]

    Crystal Leww: One of the most substantial complaints (i.e. not nonsensical yelling about what constitutes **real hip-hop**) about pop Nicki Minaj is that she always sounds like everyone but herself. “Whip It” was Britney circa-2012, “Beautiful Sinner” was Rihanna, and “Young Forever” was Ke$ha in “The Harold Song,” which is Ke$ha doing Taylor Swift. “Pills N Potions” is, oddly enough, Minaj doing Lykke Li — not exactly a pop star, but definitely someone who makes music who can be classified as pop. That’s perfect, completely poetic for Minaj, who has spent her entire career straddling the line between multiple genres (“mixtape Minaj” doesn’t exist; Beam Me Up Scotty had the wonderfully taut “Handstand” among other pop tracks) because hey, Nicki Minaj contains multitudes. “Pills N Potions” has its problems: the song lacks a focused subject matter, the raps are a bit generic, and the Ester Dean assist is just slightly tonally out of place. And yet, for how close this is to being a really bad song, it’s got just enough superstar power to make it work. In particular is that bridge, quietly nostalgic for the person who makes her high from a tangential contact with their memory and desperately hopeful for a future. There’s a hole in the Billboard charts this summer where a late night, cruising down the highway tune should go, and “Pills N Potions” is ready to step in.
    [6]

    Will Adams: Because “Your Love” and “Right Thru Me” were the one-two punch of singles that launched Nicki into the stratosphere, right? Oh wait, they weren’t, they sucked, and so does “Pills N Potions.” The production is drab, and Nicki’s weak singing voice is left alone in front of it. She’s unconcerned with placating the legions of fans who wish she’d either be a rapper or be a pop star, but when the results are this mediocre, I can’t get behind it. But hey, at least I can pretend she’s singing “PASTA LOVE PASTA LOVE PASTA LOVE.”
    [2]

    Brad Shoup: It’s an IMAX flip on “T.R.O.Y.”, and if CL had iterated “I still love” to infinity, the executor of my will would be finishing this blurb. The verses are standard SMDH fare, but that hook heals all diseases of the soul. I’m guessing that’s on Ester Dean; Luke and Cirkut are uncharacteristically bashful, afraid to step on Sufjan Stevens’s turf. But I could never overdose on that blurred horn; there was no need to save it for the end.
    [7]

    Daniel Montesinos-Donaghy: The tinny, unearned (but otherwise striking) regal horns at the end are really the only thing “Pills” has going for it. How could Nicki be so boring?
    [4]

    Edward Okulicz: A couple of years ago, we all hoped that Nicki’s parade of great guest verses would set her up for a huge solo career. Now I just hope boring surefire hits like these keep her in demand for guest spots.
    [4]

    Anthony Easton: She can sing, and that little catch is a delightful touch of negating artifice, as interesting as the brass coda near the end. It’s too bad the lyrics are a jumble of pity, cliche, and talking for the sake of talking. An extra point for the percussion.
    [7]

    Madeleine Lee: If someone tells you they like this song because “it’s actually good,” don’t trust them. If someone tells you they like this song because it’s perfect, because it makes them feel like falling or floating or running or taking a deep breath, ask them on a date to the park to watch the clouds, or to meet you at a party at night on the balcony outside where it’s quiet. If someone tells you they don’t like this song, smile at them, turn the volume up, and let them get lost.
    [8]

    Megan Harrington: When I hear Nicki sing “pills n potions/ we’re overdosin’” in the saddest, tiniest voice it feels like putting a cigarette out in a fresh, open wound. I’m empathizing with her cosmic pain, of course, but there’s a secret, thrilling, roller coaster high that’s released when you go so low. That high is the song’s strong sense of finality; sometimes closure is as simple as accepting that you still love that person. Nicki uses the metaphor of failed romance to hold a mirror to all the superficial music industry machinations, but instead of elevating or condemning either experience, the takeaway is that Nicki truly is above the fray. “Looking” represented one way to do battle, “Pills N Potions” another — what’s most exciting is that Nicki never stops moving.
    [9]

    Rebecca A. Gowns: This is not a “return to form” — it’s not a “return” to anything. Nicki Minaj has consistently been turning out songs in different flavors for years. She likes to rap, but she also likes to sing, dance, pose, tell jokes, and act. She’s a jack of all trades! When it comes to her acting — well, sure, she’s in movies now, which is something she’s wanted to do since she was very young. She is also nearly always acting, always playing with which Nicki persona she wants to pull out of the doll chest next. They’re all ready at a moment’s notice. I like this one: sensitive and open, but also righteous and strong. It’s the same one at play in “Your Love,” “Fly,” “Fire Burns,” and “Still I Rise.” This persona reminds me of Sanford Meisner’s acting technique: “living truthfully in imaginary circumstances.” She may be “on” all the time, but it’s never fakery! She’ll always be who she is, delivering her stories (or, story at all) with conviction. As for the song itself, if it has to be compared to any previous Nicki “moment,” “Fly” works the best as a reference point — hurt, but triumphant. Can be played lying facedown in bed, or blasting out of speakers on the way to the beach, with the sea breeze kissing your face.
    [9]

  • Mariah Carey – Thirsty

    This will be Mariah’s 8 millionth appearance since last Friday…


    [Video]
    [4.20]

    Alfred Soto: Well, she did it. After several leaked tracks that ranged from excellent to good, she releases steaming garbage. I don’t understand the approach, choices, or voice. She doesn’t have the first, fucked up the second, and suppressed the third.
    [1]

    Crystal Leww: Mariah Carey telling dudes that they’re thirsty is some :’)-level shit.
    [6]

    Mallory O’Donnell: In which a mid-period Britney album track suddenly emerges from a cloud of generic menace. A peculiar strategy, executed without any real enthusiasm.
    [3]

    Brad Shoup: What might work on a tape may not on an album. Hit-Boy’s four-note “Niggas in Paris” slays as an intro, but irritates when laid behind a clutch of Careys trying to get elegant. Why she’d crowd so many takes into this is beyond me; perhaps it’s just to bury that hook. Once again, her taunting just comes off as mean until she brings actual social media accounts (and a string section) into the picture. This thing doesn’t lack for trying, which is definitely something I love about Mariah, but I also love when she and her team have a defined vision.
    [5]

    Thomas Inskeep: No, no, Mariah, you do not make trap records. Even by her own “misguided moves” standards, this is pretty bad. Hit-Boy and Mariah do not a good combination make. I’d totally believe this from Keyshia Cole, but not from Mariah. Not. At. All.
    [3]

    Anthony Easton: Carey’s voice has kept up, so why is the production working to disguise the fact that it might be lost? (Think about this and Dolly’s album — her voice is losing its edge after decades of faithful service, but with so little production magic to disguise what is happening.)
    [4]

    Daniel Montesinos-Donaghy: Mariah is too measured a presence for the “thirsty” talk to sting, too graceful to give herself to the bounce. Never thought I’d say this, but Rich Homie Quan is a better diva.
    [5]

    Katherine St Asaph: Carey in “Obsessed” mode, where dude’s greatest infraction is that he tries hard, something Mariah’s far too imperious to need to do. Dude’s second-greatest infraction is trying to be more famous than Mariah. Look, either these are self-evidently awesome or they’re not. “Thirsty” is deep as a GIF, but I bet Mariah really, really gets GIFs.
    [6]

    Ramzi Awn: Mariah Carey teasing “boss nowwwwwwwwwwwww, you tryin’ to be a boss nowww” is one of the best moments of the year, but unfortunately it’s just a bridge.   
    [6]

    Will Adams: Menace about as convincing as “Obsessed,” which begs the question of why that song’s template was used for this blank.
    [3]