I mean you’re not wrong there, Win…

[Video][Website]
[3.75]
Alfred Soto: Nothing they touch these days is immune from the declamatory arrogance, so even a gesture of empathy like “Creature Comfort” plays like what a friend calls performative wokeness. The Mellotron washes and sequencers don’t help: they evoke a cross-generational mishmash in which ’60s pieties about community and the way in which acts in the early ’80s used technology as distance. Whatever ails you, kids, Arcade Fire will save you, the song says.
[3]
Claire Biddles: It’s such a shame that the same people who were capable of distilling existential regret into “Children don’t grow up/Our bodies get bigger but our hearts get torn up” have regressed to corny, inelegant observations of human suffering. Someone hire Win Butler an editor.
[2]
Iain Mew: Arcade Fire songs which sound great but are dragged down by their lyrics is not a new thing, but “Creature Comfort” takes it to extremes. Musically it’s the fullest realisation of their album’s taste-agnostic collage approach, decontextualising and assembling anything that sounds good and immediate, to dazzling effect. And as long as they’re singing about everything and nothing — on and on and on and on — it works. But applying the same scattered approach to Serious Issues just doesn’t work, with their baggage that much harder to cut away and that much more likely to become as crass and jarring as this gets.
[6]
Alex Clifton: “On and on and I don’t know if I want it” sums up Everything Now-era Arcade Fire. I had hope for Disco!Fire, especially as I was one of three people who didn’t hate Reflektor, but it turns out it’s possible to ruin disco by preaching. There’s no fun in this song; it’s a labour to listen to all the way through, from Regine Chassagne’s screechy harmonies to Win Butler’s unsuccessful speak-singing. I guess they have a point, that we’re slaves to capitalism and social media and trends, but honest to god this sort of song is not the way to deliver that message. The sad thing is that this is one of the better songs on the album. One point given as the actual backing melody is decently catchy, but I’m livid that this was okayed for release.
[1]
Hannah Jocelyn: Nick Hornby has this essay about how he has no use for “Frankie Teardrop” when he has enough anxiety to deal with on his own, and the same applies here. A friend of mine went to an Arcade Fire concert, but singing along made her cringe, because who gets catharsis from shouting “SOME GIRLS HATE THEMSELVES”? There’s no subtlety anywhere, but it still feels muddled. For starters, the central motif of “wait for the feedback” has too many radically different interpretations to register — like, from a guitar? Is this another bitter social media commentary? And don’t get me started on the “first record” line. Maybe the band could explore the pressures of having people connect with you so intensely, but even then Twenty One Pilots handled that pressure in a more personal, less moralizing way on “Guns For Hands.” What saves this from being a total mess is the brutal production, the drums and synth stabs as devastatingly swaggering as the lyrics are indecisive.
[5]
Ryo Miyauchi: The reductive ways in which Win Butler hollowly lists personal trauma is one condescending attempt to connect with whoever he wants to speak with. And how self-obsessed can you be to write a scene of a girl about to take her own life and focus the scene on a lame, self-deprecating attempt at a punchline about how critics don’t love you as they used to?
[5]
Anthony Easton: Straight boys singing about girls in the most cliched way, with absurd semi-pyrotechnics in the background, made even more egergious by how it’s all about them. I’m kind of exhausted of Butler’s shit.
[2]
Tim de Reuse: Specificity and energy prevent this song from falling into pointless nihilism; a great many works of art attempt to address the psychologically harmful side-effects of the modern age (for whatever that term is decided to mean — the symptoms are usually the same regardless) and end up tedious exercises in existential dread, while “Creature Comfort” is all punchy, emotional glitz. The trouble is that its insight into its subject matter isn’t terribly deep. With its references direct, its metaphors unpoetic and its tone sing-along anthemic, it’s got the uncanny atmosphere of a hamhanded first act tone-setter from a future broadway musical drama about the early 21st century. I’m sure it’ll be a hit when it opens in a half-century or so, but for us stuck in the present day, it’s not quite as incisive as it thinks it is.
[6]