The Singles Jukebox

Pop, to two decimal places.

Month: December 2020

  • Good Riddance, 2020.

    Hi.

    We’ll spare you the “in times like these” clichés and simply say: thank you. Thank you for your readership, comments, song suggestions and overall support during this year. We’re taking tomorrow off, but we’ll be back on Monday 4 January, 2021 to cover the BBC Sound Of… shortlist and other new releases.

    But really, the point of this sign-off post is, as usual, to haphazardly Photoshop various holiday-related things onto the artist we loved the most this year. For the first time in the site’s history, we have a two-time Champion!

    At this point it’s fair to say that we will never, ever, ever, ever, ever not like a song by Simmy.

    You can listen to our top 50 songs on Spotify or YouTube. Feel free to peruse the left sidebar to read our reviews, or browse the archives to catch up on our overall coverage.

    Again, thanks, and Happy New Year.

  • Bonus Tracks Wrap-Up, 2020: Our Year-End Lists

    For the last Bonus Tracks post of 2020, we have compiled links to many of our writers’ individual year-end retrospectives and best-of lists. The Singles Jukebox is all about presenting multiple opinions rather than letting a single voice dictate something’s artistic merit, and sharing such a wide variety of personal, unique takes on the year in music (and other media!) seemed like the perfect way to wrap up 2020.

  • Megan Thee Stallion – Body

    Have you accidentally ruined a work meeting with this song? The TSJ team would like to hear from you…



    [Video][Website]
    [6.67]

    Wayne Weizhen Zhang: Until you’ve experienced the unfettered, chaotic joy of a co-worker accidentally blasting this song during the middle of a virtual work meeting, you won’t fully be able to enjoy this song like I have. 
    [8]

    Samson Savill de Jong: I suspect your entire opinion about this song will come down to whether or not you can stand the bodyodyodyodyodyoydoydoydoydoydoydoy chorus or not. Which is a shame, because everything around that is pretty unquestionably good. It’s another song by Megan bragging about how sexy she is, but she continues to do it well so there’s no reason for her to stop. The verses have flow, Megan oozes charisma, and there are some good lines in there too. But yeah, that chorus. I think Megan’s charisma is the only reason that it could ever work, but even that is not enough for me, and it strays into annoying rather than funny (especially as, being the chorus, it repeats. 4 times in a song which is less than 3 minutes long). I might be able to deal with it on a single listen through, but it makes me not want to listen to the song again.
    [6]

    Jeffrey Brister: Not as outrageously horny as “WAP,” and a bit lazier, but it’s fine. Megan keeps the one-liners coming, and switches up her flow enough to keep things interesting. And it’s a testament to how fucking long this year has felt when a Carole Baskin reference, from a work that’s not even a year old at this point, elicits a powerful groan and eye-roll from me. The diet-bounce “body-ody-ody” in the chorus grates, and makes me do that thing where I think about stuff that’s similar but better — like the chorus in Mr. Ghetto’s “Wally World“.
    [6]

    Thomas Inskeep: One of the (many) reasons I love Megan so much is the way that she doesn’t only own her sexuality, but she’s so in your face about it, and she does so to great effect on “Body,” destined to be the Thick Girl Anthem (™) of 2021. The song itself is pretty simple, with a basic beat and boomin’ bass supporting Megan (though don’t be fooled, she spits plenty of clever lines in under three minutes), and its chorus is nothing more than “Body-ody-ody-ody” ad infinitum — but in this case, its simplicity is its strength. This sounds as if designed for maximum singalong appeal, and it succeeds on that level in spades. “Body” isn’t great art, but it doesn’t have to be, to still be kinda great.
    [7]

    Harlan Talib Ockey: All right, I need a way to talk about this that doesn’t sound like the “goop on ya grinch” tweet. The flow? Unambitious. “Body” lacks the virtuosic rhythmic and timbral switch-ups we’ve seen from Megan on singles like “Captain Hook” or even “W.A.P.” The closest comparison would perhaps be “B.I.T.C.H.”, but while the simplicity there felt frank and impassioned, it’s hard to tell what she’s going for with it here. The lyrics? Also meh. There are a couple of good punchlines (see: “baby back”), but nothing truly jaw-dropping, and vast swaths of the verses end up largely nondescript. The beat? Oh no, did I accidentally stumble into the “straight” category on PornHub? Actually, the beat is pretty fantastic. LilJu keeps its incessant energy up while still creating depth and nuance through the bass hits and camera snaps. The hook? Absolutely infuriating. I kind of love it. It’s one of those drunken-scream-along chants that I’m sure is going to pop off in a group setting, even if it’s rough when you’re just sitting at home. Overall? This is mostly pedestrian hot girl shit buoyed by a few bright spots.
    [6]

    John Pinto: Megan Thee Stallion’s Buzzfeed quiz results are in and not only would she have sex with her clone, she’d probably make a bunch of clones and just get it on with all of them at once because that’s how pro clone-fucking she is. “Body” proves that such thought experiments are perfect for quarantine, when the immediacy of sex must transform into something responsibly distanced (googling pics of Megan for… reasons) or totally abstract (staring at the mirror until you break the word “body” down to base syllables).
    [8]

    Austin Nguyen: While it doesn’t boast some of her more memorable lines (Pray Tell is a plus though), “Body” takes what Beyoncé did with BOOF BOOF as punctuation and hula-hoops the syllables around for an entire chorus, going from “body” to “yody” to “yada” with nothing but bed-thumping bass and Megan’s bravado in the verses.
    [6]

    Edward Okulicz: Megan’s created an amazing jingle for an advertisement for some kind of sports bra but bless her, she’s forgotten to do much else other than be harmlessly smutty besides. To be fair, “bodyodyodyodyodyodyody” is so massive a hook that style guides are going to include standardised spellings of it to get everyone on the same page while it’s a hit. Megan’s confidence and presence is such that she almost gets away with doing not a lot else, but “Body” is exhausting once you get over the fact that unlike her best work, there’s no particular wit on offer in her one-liners.
    [5]

    John Seroff: BODYoddyoddyoddyoddyoddyoddyoddyoddyoddyoddyoddyoddyoddyoddy, by which I mean to say: this absolutely slaps.
    [8]

  • Taylor Swift – Willow

    ‘Tis the damn season…



    [Video]
    [7.07]

    Rachel Bowles: The Swiftian renaissance continues unabated. If folklore took us back to the old Taylor we knew and loved (perfectly honed hooks, insightful storytelling — lucid, expansive yet concise) evermore promises that this is more than just a one-album cycle. Finally shedding the self-conscious anxiety that has plagued her since the Reputation era, Taylor has quietly and confidently returned to her wheelhouse stronger than ever, sprinkling the (almost) universal and the quotidian with just enough fairydust to craft sublime folky dream pop. Though percipience was always a cornerstone of her songwriting, (how else does a young teenager write a song like “Fifteen”?) Swift’s maturity and wisdom has grown on “Willow,” enough to know that she doesn’t know, a lesson quietly sung back to us from the hush of 2020 and a world stuck in a perpetual present.
    [10]

    Thomas Inskeep: Evermore is the stripped-down singer-songwriter album I’ve wanted from Swift for quite a while; folklore was part of the way there, but its companion (it’s not a sequel) goes all the way. Credit the National’s Aaron Dessner, a songwriter or producer on 14 of 15 of the album’s tracks, but credit even more the way that working with Dessner seems to have freed Swift up to write in some different, less-adorned ways. The musical accompaniment and arrangements, more naturalistic and less fussy on evermore, lend themselves to this set of songs. “Willow,” even with strings and a glockenspiel, feels simple in just the right way, keeping the focus as is should be, on Swift’s lyrics. “Every bait and switch was a work of art” is such a perfect little line, and “Willow,” like evermore, is full of them. It’s also worth noting that she spends much of this song singing in her lower register, which really, uh, registers with me. This album doesn’t sound like Joni Mitchell, but evermore is definitely Taylor Swift’s Joni Mitchell album (maybe her Hissing of Summer Lawns?), and “willow” is a sterling distillation of it.
    [8]

    Juana Giaimo: I don’t agree with the people who say that in folklore and evermore Taylor Swift went back to her roots, because these albums have something the old Taylor didn’t have: emotional distance. She has said that for these albums she wrote non-autobiographical songs, and I think this influenced not only the lyrics, but also the music. “Willow” is calm, there is space in between the lines and, most importantly, there is no rush to build a big dramatic moment: there is a verse after the bridge and when the final chorus finally arrives, she sings the last part on a deeper register — and it fits beautifully.
    [8]

    Asif Becher: The component parts work — her voice on the verses, the way the melody gets rearranged just slightly on the bridge, a stray lyric here and there. But it never comes together. There’s something fluffy and airy about this song, and it never quite touches land. She stays in her head voice the entire time and eschews the vocal tricks she usually uses to make a payoff line stick. That would normally be a problem, but it’s canceled out by the fact that the lyric is so unremarkable, free of any lines that are in any particular need of a big payoff. The few moments of lyrical acuity or classic Swift storytelling she does sneak in (“I’m begging for you to take my hand” or “Wait for the signal and I’ll meet you after dark”) are buried under the rolling sameyness of the production. The song would like us to think it’s stripped back and acoustic, but make no mistake, this jaunty, almost classical (can I just say: ew) guitar takes center stage here, dominating Taylor’s voice, melodies, and presence. The biggest problem that Aaron Dessner has presented Taylor with here is he’s erased the part of her songwriting process in which she is central — the moment of sitting at the piano, having a lightbulb blink up in her big, weird brain, and creating something from nothing that is uniquely hers. Everyone has a version of Taylor Swift they take personally, a version they believe is the Real Taylor. I don’t know at all which is the Real Taylor, but this one — who sings in a low-register, who’s muted and unobtrusive, without a sparkle in sight, who cedes to the production whims and musical directions of the kind of mopey man she used to make fun of — certainly isn’t mine. I would like a certain someone to be removed from this narrative, one I’ve never asked him to be a part of, since 2020.
    [5]

    Leah Isobel: Taylor’s command of songcraft remains impressive — the way her melody lilts around the swaying instrumental is hypnotic, and mirrors the images of ships and trains and wind. I like the line about ’90s trends, too, and how its silliness punctures the hushed atmosphere of reverent heterosexuality. I wish that wit was present in the rest of the song.
    [5]

    Scott Mildenhall: If anyone were canny enough to know that giving such exaggerated focus to a line as egregious as “I come back stronger than a 90s trend” was a surefire way of drawing both the derision of know-betters and, more importantly, the approval of YouTube commenters, it would be Taylor Swift. That said, “Willow” is not otherwise immune to such laboured wordplay and awkward allusions — the notion that trophies are mythical is nothing after an opening verse of muddling through a mislabelled maritime mind map. Its writerly ambitions are its weakness, but fortunately its strength overpowers them. When Swift keeps things simpler — more musical — the daintiness of its dance with danger comes into its own. The chorus, so precise and suggestive of imperilled innocence, is palpably wistful for a merely emerging awareness of a forever-or-flames situation. The succinctness is poetry; the elaboration is a puncture.
    [7]

    Jonathan Bradley: “I come back stronger than a ’90s trend,” is a hard and pristine Taylor Swift koan, sly and prepossessing in the way it transforms self-knowledge into strength. I love it, and it also has little to do with “Willow,” the first single from evermore and the song in which it appears as a lyric. The same might be said for the tune’s “wreck my plans/that’s my man” hook, which appears as an airy swoon whispered in the private spaces of a Reputation deep cut. What is most arresting about “Willow,” though, is the otherwordly thatch of its guitar, which grows as clumped twigs in an uncivilized expanse, suggesting a magic not of the wondrous golden invisible string portrayed in the video, but of an untamed and untrustable wilderness, the sort that exists in the dark places between the shadows and the bleached trees of a moonlit night. If you’ve ever been out in the bush after dark, shining a torch into the endless ghost spaces where the scrub ends, you might imagine how this song swallows the unknown into its edges. Swift aligns herself with the natural world and all its witchcraft — she is the ocean and her life is the bending willow — but this interloping man has a magic all of his own, too; he can summon pure and plain pop choruses. He intrudes, and I feel threatened, but he is also worthy of awe; I suppose it really is awesome to have one’s plans wrecked sometimes.
    [8]

    Edward Okulicz: Definitely here for woodsy Taylor Swift showing some Big Witch Energy, and this is measured and meticulous as any of her songs. It still feels odd as a single because of that well-documented feeling you might have when a fave puts out something you like that’s only pretty good when you know they’re still capable of really good. Casting a spell is probably quite a lot like baking cookies — and I think Taylor Swift’s cookies look like magic — but her love spell song is just a little too neat to be magic. But below-average Taylor is still well above-average pop, and good on her for disrupting people’s cosy year-end list bubble.
    [7]

    Alex Clifton: Gosh, this is pretty. So simple and lovely. I have loved the folklore/evermore, era as it’s a wonderful opportunity to hear Swift without stacked layers of production. Much as I love a lot of her pop hits and Max Martin collaborations, I’ve always wanted a stripped-back project from Taylor that allows her to play around a bit without having to worry about radio plays. Swift has likened “Willow” specifically to casting a love spell, and she’s not wrong. The lilting melody hasn’t left my brain in weeks, Taylor obsession aside; it’s really magnetic and pulls me in like the tide. After listening to this once, I felt like I arrived home somewhere, a warm sense of comfort enveloping me. While one of my favourite things about music is how it can take me away from where my physical body is, I think you’ve struck gold if you are able to make your music sound like a place you wouldn’t mind living in. I’m delighted that Swift has decided to stick around in the woods for a bit; it suits her well and has provided me with some of the most reassuring music I have heard in a long time.
    [8]

    Rachel Saywitz: I can forgive Swift’s breathy falsetto in the chorus of “Willow” because the melody has such a youthful bounce to it. But I’m still trying to figure out if “I come back stronger than a ’90s trend” is a good line or not.
    [8]

    Alfred Soto: As folklore‘s melodically desiccated companion, evermore contains too many on-the-nose lyrics in search of contexts. “Willow,” for example, has “I come back stronger than a ’90s trend” for no reason other than Taylor Swift jotted it down in a notebook or something but couldn’t figure out where to stick it. But Aaron Dessner weds the stand-by-your-man chorus to a sticky enough hook, thus permitting another minor triumph.
    [6]

    Wayne Weizhen Zhang: My problem with “Willow,” like my problem with much of evermore irrespective of Taylor’s dalliances with Aaron Dessner, is that the songwriting feels stilted and odd. The best Taylor Swift lyrics work because they feel plucked from the crevices of everyday of life: “I never saw you coming, and I’ll never be the same,” “Is it cool that I said all that?,” “I don’t wanna look at anything else now that I saw you.” Taylor Swift has had successes with different kinds of storytelling and perspective-taking as of late, but “Willow” suffocates itself with its central arboreal conceit, and out-of-place one-liners like, “Lost in your current like a priceless wine.”
    [5]

    Austin Nguyen: Whether you see this as pre-Illuminations cottagecore Rimbaud or pseudo-Rupi Kaur after a short-lived camping trip, I don’t think you can fully explain to me 1) how any work, musical or otherwise, should traverse from Odyssean waters to Law and BevMo!rder, 2) why a man is, all at once, The Ship, The Myth, and The Championship Ring, or 3) if there is any bigger tone disruptor than “but I come back stronger than a ’90s trend.” At least there’s no cognitive dissonance in the production — which, albeit predictable (the violin pouts for the middle eight, then disappears), is pretty — and there are no trucks?
    [5]

    John Seroff: I distinctly remember getting into an argument with a friend over dinner a short time after Red came out. My position was that Taylor had already proven herself as a serious artist and that her promised maturity as a songwriter and performer in the years ahead would likely lead to a lifetime catalog with the potential to stand alongside Dolly Parton. We’re almost a decade past that relatively early prognostication and songs like “Willow” leave me still ambivalent about my thinking, then and now. At it’s best, “Willow” is a sugar cookie with a clean aftertaste, powered by tripping pizzicato strings and packed with a murderer’s row of hipster new music personnel: Doveman on keys, Clarice Jensen on cello, So Percussion’s Jason Treuting on glockenspiel. Taylor’s voice cooperates well enough with that enviable ensemble, but the weak link for me is the song’s waxy lyrical veneer. At this stage in her career, Swift’s fragile princess mode particularly distracts as jaded and leaves “Willow” with the feel of marketed product, not poetry. She’s one of the most powerful women in the world; even forgiving pratfalls like the “’90s trend” song-stopper, hearing Taylor regressively pine for a generic white knight showcases the least interesting part of her artistic persona. It’s not all she does, but I dearly wish Taylor would consistently stop bending and either stand or snap.
    [7]

    Andrew Karpan: The whisper-thin production makes the chorus sound like an agitated secret that Swift is sharing with us, this old story of not-quite requited love that manages to sound both sad and clever, melodramatic and sarcastic. It’s only when she pauses to underline her own witticism (the too-quotable line likening her latest commercial turn of fortune to a “come back stronger than a ’90s trend”) that the smooth line falters and she’s Reputation-era Taylor again, a pool of contrived snark with diminishing returns. But other moments move more by saying less. The light, pained smirk from which Swift says the phrase “that’s my man.” The sad warmth in how Swift says “home.”
    [9]

  • Ed Sheeran – Afterglow

    If you thought 2020 was finally going to be the year TSJ didn’t do an Ed Sheeran single, well, he and we both had other plans…


    [Video][Website]
    [4.42]
    Jeffrey Brister: Eric Whitacre and “Hide and Seek” entered my life simultaneously at a critical moment. Delicate voices singing through dense vocal harmonies catch my heart like few things do — it’s one of those things that shorts out my critical circuits, turning “probably not very good” into “this’ll do.” It’s why I watch the “Vet Tech Tiktok” so much. Sheeran isn’t attempting any vocal or compositional feats, and he definitely isn’t doing anything particularly interesting, but that little flourish covers up a lot of the dullness of the song.
    [5]

    Andrew Karpan: The bug-or-a-feature element of Sheeran’s songs is that he writes them from a place of aww-shucks contemplative pity, a sorrow that ricochets off his dour pipes onto his subject before looping back like a boomerang. On this acoustic throwaway, the now-married Sheeran sounds positively forlorn about the prospect of eternal love that he’s signed onto and has transposed these anxieties onto his beloved, who appears here like an angel, complete with trippy multicolor halo. (“A million colors of hazel, golden, and red,” hang off her head, the bard sings.) For now, Sheeran had committed to hanging in there, his fingers clinging desperately onto the titular afterglow, mustering memories of wandering around in the snow, which surely isn’t my idea of a honeymoon. But Sheeran doesn’t quite have the voice or the register to sell this midlife crisis as a moody banger and instead it just sorta sits there.
    [4]

    Frank Falisi: Like finding a mix CD your old old crush made you in 2008, the grin you split when you hear Imogen Heap on it. This strum doesn’t mean like it used to but it did and does mean something and I’m grateful to flit with it.
    [6]

    Austin Nguyen: After venturing all the way out to Mexico in a vain attempt to find his (nonexistent) sex appeal, Ed Sheeran has finally concluded that home is where the horny heart is. Which, to some extent, is a relief; hearing him flirt at a bar was basically another iteration of that Heathers line: “Kurt Kelly. Quarterback. He is the smartest guy on the football team. Which is kind of like being the tallest dwarf.” At the same time though, Sheeran’s habit of busking ~ sincerity ~ and ~ sensitivity ~ now has an aftertaste of complacency rather than comfort. Otherwise stated: You invested all that time making an entire album of collaborations, and came away with nothing? Granted, there are changes (two, to be specific, the bare minimum for pluralization), but was it really that great of an idea to add Bon Iver-ian vocoder (it wasn’t; it only undercuts the natural harmonies to the point that they sound flat/off-key) and the synth from “Animal”? I’m sure someone — the same English teacher I had who spent seven minutes fangirling over the rhetorical shifts in “Castle on the Hill” probably — will like (dare I say, love) this. I’m sure someone will have an appreciation for the “literary techniques” Sheeran uses that contribute to a “complex” portrayal of romance — personification (“light dances off your hair”), imagery (“hazel, golden and red”), tense change (from past to future in the chorus), etc. — but it won’t be me. Because I don’t see a sunset worth watching or a relationship deserving of a promise or any other construed profundity; what I see is Ed being Ed, sifting through his Hot 100 history to recycle the same pseudo-poetic detail, with an edit here and there: The setting defaults to winter. “Stop the clocks,” “time’s forever frozen” or some other moment-fossilizing lyric. Intimacy is determined by whatever beverage is in your hand. Instead of “Tiny Dancer,” Iron & Wine gets a mention in the verse. And the eyes continue to be the gateway to love’s future, not the palms. Each time, the formula works, propagating itself to coffee houses, high school proms, contemporary dance routines, the Grey’s Anatomy soundtrack, and so it continues in its two-three year cycle. “Ed Sheeran blows the dust off of his guitar to gift a song that could’ve been laying in the attic for the last 5 years,” the headline reads. Is it too late to make a return?
    [4]

    Katherine St Asaph: One last disturbing development of 2020: I’m starting to like Ed Sheeran songs. Not just “songs,” either, but this particular song, which is a bath of sap, whose second verse crashes into the forte register with all the subtlety of a meteoroid piloted by Leeroy Jenkins; whose constant vocoding sounds like it’s disguising what sure seems like a catastrophic a cappella vocal; with an Iron & Wine shoutout that’s even more of a “please take me seriously again” batsignal than Folklore/Evermore were; that on the whole sounds sounds like a bet that megachurches will come back before Ed gets another No. 1 hit (so, in about two weeks). I didn’t ask for this. Please end this year.
    [5]

    Tobi Tella: There’s a point when it comes to hated artists, both personally and by the Discourse, where I have to stop and consider if I’m really being fair to them. The first thing that came to mind to complain about was the weird vocoder overdub, but wouldn’t I just call it boring if it was one vocal line? There’s nothing really wrong with the lyric other than being a little generic;  would I think it was brilliant if someone I didn’t hate wrote it? It honestly made me consider my whole Sheeran world view; was he ever bad? Am I just prejudiced against white boys with guitars? Ultimately, I listened again, remembered the whole song is basically played at one level and it does nothing to capture attention or any other emotion other than Great Value romance. Sometimes bad things are just bad!
    [4]

    Anna Katrina Lockwood: Not the greatest timing for Ed Sheeran to so clearly reference Bon Iver’s vocoder sound from My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, not two months after that record’s 10th anniversary. 10 years feels neither recent enough to count as riding a trend, nor is it quite long enough past to trigger nostalgia. The lyrics for “Afterglow” are almost exactly as expected — completely trite — with the exception of an Iron and Wine reference that is contextually startling in its thematic irrelevance. For all that, there’s nothing actively offensive about this song, aurally speaking; I simply have no desire to listen to any more British dude murmuring.
    [3]

    John Seroff: Coming soon to a 2022 Lexus and/or De Beers Christmas commercial near you, here’s audio proof that a song can be so utterly innocuous and calculatedly inoffensive that it comes all the way back around to repellant.
    [2]

    Alfred Soto: Dude can write melodies — maybe he could’ve given Taylor Swift a crucial assist on Evermore. Here’s more post-coital twaddle with fewer production gewgaws: Ed Sheeran offering Cat Stevens-ian mush.
    [6]

    Edward Okulicz: A nice melody can take you on a journey, or it can take you precisely nowhere, with dead-end words like “afterglow” on a nice but dead-end song with a title like “Afterglow.” To be good enough at what you do that you can throw this out without an album coming up must be nice, and it must be nice to be one of the millions who hear profundity or beauty in it. But I can’t go that far, it’s really just kind of nice. I also suspect he’s more likely listening to “Mistletoe and Wine” than Iron & Wine these days.
    [5]

    Rachel Bowles: I appreciate that I am not the audience for this; Ed Sheeran has described “Afterglow” as a Christmas present to his fans, which suggests stan wish fulfilment over any attempt at crossover chart appeal to the general listener. With this potentially limited scope in mind, “Afterglow” arguably even fails at fan service; what should essentially be a simple, stripped back, sentimental Dad-rock ballad, is given what can only be described as a nightmarish vocal treatment. The thought process behind this is potentially rational enough, perhaps an electronic multiplicity of Ed Sheerans theoretically could give a thin, saccharine ode to wife and child some much needed gravitas, worthy of its subject matter. In practice sadly the effect is pretty unpleasant and cancels out any poetry in Sheeran’s earnest lyricism.
    [3]

    Thomas Inskeep: My loathing of Sheeran is well-documented, but I have to say, the simplicity of the production on “Afterglow” suits him — and I’m not generally prone to loving the sound of a male voice with an acoustic guitar. The way the vocals are recorded here — is he singing harmony with himself? — sounds great, and the subtle keyboard line that comes in underneath the second verse and chorus is effective as well. I’d love to hate this, but can’t, because it doesn’t earn my hatred; it earns my grudging respect.
    [6]

  • GFriend – Mago

    …and from Brian, some K-pop disco reverie.


    [Video]
    [6.90]

    Brian Hsiao: 2020 has seen disco comebacks aplenty from Kylie Minogue, Dua Lipa, The Weeknd and many, many others. This trend was bound to make its way to South Korea, but it anchored a reinvention of image for the nation’s angels. The girls sing with such enthusiasm that their confidence is glimmering on the dance floor; their conviction is particularly strong when Yuju croons “my heart is beating for you!” I really couldn’t ask for more from GFriend than a witch-based disco anthem with the phrase “hakuna matata.” “Mago” is a burst of flavors that doesn’t feel as exact as Western interpretations of disco revival.
    [10]

    Samson Savill de Jong: Do you miss the late 2000s/early 2010s when popular music was loud, in your face, full of thumping bass lines and/or drums, kind of obnoxious and a little formulaic, and felt big, unlike now when it’s all a bit downbeat, depressed, kind of pretentious and a little algorithmically generated and personal? Boy, do I have a song (and genre) for you. (I like the “yes you” ad lib.)
    [5]

    Katherine St Asaph: Are we at “Poker Face” nostalgia already? I guess, plus “Hung Up,” the bass hook from “I Wanna Go,” all of which adds up to Chromatica. Which is all pretty good; I miss pop sounding poppy.
    [6]

    Austin Nguyen: A four-on-the-floor beat of brisk anticipation that GFRIEND deliver on: Yuju makes romance an existentialist drama (“My life is waiting for YOU”) before the group chimes in with a Sailor Moon-cute wink (“Yes, you!”), and SinB struts in with sassy detachment (“tick, tock, tick, tock”) that chips away into a sultry “ring my heart” until Eunha turns it into a smirking dare the next measure. The dancefloor is never too crowded, and the disco ball doesn’t outlast its stay; “MAGO” is the work of a group performing efficiently and at full capacity, each member of GFRIEND with their own personality/twist in the spotlight without interfering with the structure of the song itself (case in point: the all-empty-but-a-synth bridge SinB slow-walks into to build up into a final chorus). But really, all you need to know is that this has enough karaoke potential to overlook a decades-old Disney reference.
    [8]

    Thomas Inskeep: 2020 just keeps giving up disco-soaked pop: “Mago” sits firmly in between Dua Lipa and Kylie Minogue’s efforts from this year. The “tick tock tick tock” refrain gives me Madonna-sampling-ABBA vibes, which only adds to the ’70s ambience.
    [6]

    Rose Stuart: I don’t know what made vaporwave the K-pop trend of the year, but at some point almost every girl group had ’80s synths and a disco guitar line in there somewhere. As much as I love a retro sound, most of these songs have been underwhelming, even from artists I normally adore like Sunmi and Twice. “Mago” has the same problem as Twice’s “I CAN’T STOP ME.” These songs sound the way a baseless cheesecake tastes. Everything is fine, but there isn’t anything for it all to rest on and hold it together. It almost feels like a track got deleted by accident when the song was being mixed. So with only a week left in the year, I feel fairly comfortable crowning EVERGLOW’s “LA DI DA” (which, unlike “Mago,” is all about that bass) the winner of K-pop’s 2020 vaporwave trend. 
    [5]

    Jessica Doyle: I feel the same way about “Mago” that I did about “Fingertip“: GFriend executes so well that they paradoxically end up hurting their own cause. “Mago” is ostensibly a song about celebrating oneself and refusing to pay attention to others’ judgment, which means that just about any Korean female idol group is going to have trouble selling it. (Mamamoo may have the best chance of succeeding, while being faintly smug about it.) GFriend’s approach is to lay every necessary brick with such precision that the idea of not trying to please an audience is completely lost. I feel slightly guilty for applauding their technical prowess and then going back to “EV. ER. GLOW. FOREV. ER. LET’S. GO.
    [7]

    Andrew Karpan: K-pop disco about the color-coded possibilities of reinvention. After a few spins, I began to understand that the fact the song doesn’t go anywhere–that no beat drops, that the end shimmers and glistens much like the beginning–is the very point. Self-discovery is stirred from outside, not in. “My life is waiting for you,” the chorus goes, a depressing thought, though the folks in GFriend don’t sound incredibly bothered by the idea of all that waiting around, trying on clothes. Maybe it’s the brief moments of pole dancing in the video, but the vibe reminded me of the best part of that Jennifer Lawrence movie Hustlers, the half with all the celebrity cameos, where Lizzo and Cardi B swing by to play strippers waiting around for the Great Recession to start. Ominous, but upbeat.
    [5]

    Joshua Lu: Part of “Mago”‘s strength lies in how it doesn’t try too hard to be too much. The song is restrained enough to make the aberrant flourishes stand out even more, such as the wonky cadence in the prechorus or the vocal pushes in the “yes you” ad libs. While most other disco-esque K-pop songs, in their quest to sound like “Blinding Lights,” sound like they’re going through the motions until they can scream in the chorus, GFriend remains subdued throughout. They let their strong but straightforward vocals wind their way around you, slowly but surely putting you under their spell. You don’t always need explosions and bombast; a steady tick-tock can be all the more alluring.
    [8]

    Kayla Beardslee: If you listen closely enough, I think you can hear the meaning of life somewhere in the shimmering disco beat.
    [9]

  • Jessy Lanza – Lick in Heaven

    For the last day of Reader’s Week, Juan Carlos gave to us: spinning, spinning, spinning…


    [Video]
    [7.20]

    Ryo Miyauchi: Jessy Lanza’s dance-pop has always reminded me of Arthur Russell: enamored by the disco but preferring to participate from the sidelines. She still maintains a distance from the music in “Lick in Heaven,” her vocals garbled and full of echo like they’re being transmitted through the venue’s intercom. Compared to her past flirtations with house, though, Lanza sounds eager to join the action. She audibly swings her shoulders to the beat as her voice sticks out more in the mix. “I can’t stop spinning,” she cries out with such joy before the glowing synth riff takes it away. Sometimes even the most bashful of us can’t resist a good beat.
    [8]

    Leah Isobel: Over the summer, I described this song on the suggestions spreadsheet as sounding “like a bathtub overflowing, but in a fun way.” I know how I got there — the synth textures (particularly the bass) are humid and elastic, Jessy Lanza’s voice is humid and breathless, and the instruments and the vocals clip into and over one another like they’re trying to evaporate past their structural boundaries. That dissolution feels more like corrosion; Lanza’s vocal is surrounded by a bitcrushed halo while pitched-down murmurs threaten to yank her into the muck. The dichotomy between warmth and darkness hits the emotional target in a song about anger, as if she can’t decide if she can love her rage while still hating the person it turns her into. That conflict makes the track short-circuit. It’s like someone throwing a toaster into an overflowing bathtub — but in a fun way.
    [8]

    Thomas Inskeep: Pleasantly minimal DIY synth-pop: decent, but nothing more.
    [5]

    Ian Mathers: Is it fair to the pretty wonderful Jessy Lanza that my first, last, and overriding thought here is just “I miss Junior Boys”? No, of course not. But the heart wants what it wants.
    [7]

    Nortey Dowuona: Wilting synths wait for the bass and the gumball drums as Jessy scatters them with her paper-thin voice, which folds into a whirligig, messing up the synths, bass and drums. They unfold and Jessy scatters them again, watching them climb the wall and bringing in more whirligigs to buoy her up. The bass leaps back into place with the synths and drums, while scattered Pokémon leap around, picking up leftover apples. Jessy lands with three bushels carried by her whirligigs, which separate as she begins to plant the seeds, still buoyed, until she’s dropped on her bum.
    [5]

    Katherine St Asaph: Squelches cheerfully for a couple of minutes, though it doesn’t do much more; I can’t decide whether the overall effect is delightful or just nice.
    [7]

    Samson Savill de Jong: There’s a lot of stuff going on that isn’t immediately obvious on the first listen: little squeaks, notes, soft voices buried in the mix that add layers to the song. They prevent “Lick in Heaven” from being repetitive, but I still think it’s too long. A song like this can’t exactly do “high energy” — that’s not what it’s built for — but it tries a version after becoming quieter near the end, and while the section isn’t bad, I don’t think it was necessary. Also, I can’t decide if this is background music. There’s too much going on, and the glitchy sound is too prominent to have it on while you’re doing some other task, but I don’t think it’s arresting enough to listen to on its own.
    [6]

    Austin Nguyen: A warped-glass (or, in this case, synth) mirage that makes me question whether a sound akin to the Slack notification alert can make me move out of pleasure instead of panic. And here I am, “spinning, spinning.”
    [8]

    Brendan Nagle: Many of Lanza’s best songs are driven by an undercurrent of rage, and this is no exception, the painful downward spiral of a breakdown merging with the blissful release of the dance floor until the two become indistinguishable, one whirlwind of emotion. Although it’s suggested that her “spinning” will go on forever, Lanza does eventually come to a stop late in the song. Everything grinds to a halt, the beat drops out, and we’re left with an amorphous outline made up of soft synth flutters. Is this a moment of plaintive reflection? Or an exhausted collapse? We’ve only just begun to settle into its dreamy atmosphere when the beat snaps back into place and the spinning carries on, with more abandon than ever.
    [9]

    Oliver Maier: I was surprised to see Lanza cite rage as the inspiration for “Lick in Heaven”, not just because the song is about as tempestuous as a pillowfight, but because the lyrics on paper could be mapped onto all kinds of emotional extremes. Her delivery is implacable though, and she mixes her voice super weird to boot, so in practice the words pass like textural ornaments rather than conveyors of meaning. What can I say, it’s a trick that delights me. The instrumental, given centre stage, twirls nonchalantly between transcendence and slapstick, half “Empty” and half “BIPP.” Dizzy with possibilities; spinning, spinning.
    [9]

  • Allie X & Mitski – Susie Save Your Love

    And here’s Sam with not one but two artists along those lines…


    [Video]
    [6.77]

    Vikram Joseph: Unrequited queer longing, a luxuriant R&B groove, sumptuous strings, a deliciously overwrought Prince guitar solo and a cameo from Mitski at her most wryly captivating? No Christmas song has made me feel this festive this year.
    [8]

    Sam Gavin: Mitski’s first co-headlining track is the apparent product of an L.A. session with Allie X, the first part of a plan to elude an untenably bright spotlight while scratching an itch for writing for other artists. (There are several other folks in the credits, including CRJ-whisperer Nate Campany.) “Susie Save Your Love” feels like a real swerve for both artists, an elliptically sexy jam that vibrates with dramatic tension, splitting the difference between pining and predatory and sounding exactly like a bad night in the hills. Susie should probably call a Lyft.
    [8]

    Will Adams: A cool collab and concept on paper, but I don’t know, am I naïve for thinking that a queered “You Belong With Me” would have an arrangement that’s not this plodding?
    [5]

    Aaron Bergstrom: Enjoy this song in three easy steps! (Advanced students may proceed directly to Step Three.) Step One: Do not judge it against the standard of, “Okay, so this is the only thing Mitski was willing to break her self-imposed hiatus for in all of 2020?” Step Two: Do not ask questions like “Wait, if this is the story of a love triangle involving two women, and the song is a collaboration between two women, why are they both singing from the point of view of the same character?” Step Three: Once you’ve completed Steps One and Two, listen to it again and judge it on its own merits: sleek, shimmering synth-pop tinged with sadness, a fitting soundtrack for driving around late at night while not telling your best friend you’re in love with her.
    [8]

    Thomas Inskeep: A surprising record that gets more compelling as it progresses. “Susie Save Your Love” starts out sounding like fairly conventional indie-pop (albeit with charming lyrics about a woman in love with her ostensibly straight best friend), but then its chorus unveils some delightful synth-horns, backing vocals from Mitski low in the mix, and most interestingly, a skronking guitar (which is even louder and longer at the second chorus). And then some sparkling circa-1983 new-wave-turning-into-synthpop keyboards come in and stay through the song’s fade, adding something special.
    [8]

    Katherine St Asaph: Aims for St. Vincent, I think, but ends up in “Baby Come Back” yacht-rock hell. Also, Susie being this drunk is probably not the time to swoop in for the “save your love and take mine” kill? (This song — particularly that “she’s way too drunk to drive, but oh, she’s such a sight to see, someone needs to set her free” bit — would come across very differently from a man, and not just because it’d be hetero.)
    [1]

    Alfred Soto: The seamlessness with which Allie and Mitski’s voices blend adds sisterly support to a song about a woman who pines for the usual unworthy. The production details — ugly guitar noise here, horns there — are delightful.
    [7]

    Nortey Dowuona: Drums kick open the door for Allie to walk in. A synth falls off the stairs as Allie begins to climb, mewling echoes in the other rooms as Mitski opens the door. Allie begins excitedly explaining Popeye’s while the mewling echoes lick up the synths.
    [8]

    Anna Katrina Lockwood: The melodies of this song are plotted in reverse, starting with a high pitch that gets pulled to a lower-pitch chorus. It’s a neat trick in a song packed with sweet little details: the super muted, distorted wah guitar line following the chorus; the elastic yet steady bassline; the narrative lyrics. Unrequited love is a deep well to draw from, and Allie and Mitski balance recounting the situation and conveying the emotional ambience of the subject matter.
    [7]

    Wayne Weizhen Zhang: The quenchless, throbbing ache of “Your Type,” mixed with the driving, circuitous conceit of “Backseat,” swimming in a bath of queer cosmic energy. 
    [7]

    Samson Savill de Jong: Cruising down the street with your drunk homie (who you’re very in love with) while they bitch about the idiot guy they like for some reason has never sounded so good.
    [8]

    Rose Stuart: The bass line is killer, the vocals are just the right amount of airy to sound relaxed and wistful, and when the synths and guitar combine for the outro everything falls into place. When the same refrains repeat over and over, almost refusing to build, you can feel the exhausted frustration that the lyrics try to convey. There’s just enough absence to give it the same liminal vibe as being in a car at night. It’s a good song. The problem is that a collaboration from Allie X and Mitski, two of the current “it girls” of indie pop, off an album as good as Cape God should have been great.
    [7]

    Austin Nguyen: Opens with LÉON, but shifts to a bassline with some blips of Ashe before arriving at midtempo disco fit for crossing the street or tapping your foot on the outskirts of the dancefloor. Reddit user foxygingerr said it best: It’s “catchy and a lil gay”; no more, no less.
    [6]

  • Rina Sawayama – Bad Friend

    Next, Caitlin settles the burning question of the past few weeks: which Rina Sawayama single do we do?


    [Video]
    [7.78]

    Jacob Sujin Kuppermann: The idea of Rina Sawayama is one of a genre-expanding, one-of-a-kind artist, pilfering the CD collections of 1998-2003 and adding her own unique twist. That’s what Sawayama sells you on: the nu-metal pomp of “STFU!” and “Dynasty”, the faux Max Martin of “XS”, the house pastiche of “Comme Des Garçons.” “Bad Friend” isn’t nostalgic in style, though, so much as nostalgic in tone. The production is reminiscent of contemporary lite-EDM producers like Snakehips or Kygo, but from its first lines, it lands you in a specific place and time. It’s an expertly struck ballad: both the big moves, like the vocoder on the hook, and the small, like the softly arpeggiating synths behind the verses, accent Sawayama’s vocal performance. She sings with a regret and tenderness and a complete lack of cleverness, letting emotion overtake her for once.
    [8]

    Caitlin Gee: The song’s structure is a neat little trick. On the one hand, it is built like a pop song. On the other hand, it’s uncomfortably accurate for the content of the song. Haven’t you had a time where memories of a once-forgotten relationship lazily bubble up like hazy synth blips, only to have painfully sharp realizations of what really happened slice through the fog and shake you with the vibrations of a thousand vocoders? “Bad Friend” aligns with the recent experiences I’ve had reflecting on past ended friendships — how much I hurt at the time, how much I might have hurt them at the time. As Rina points out in her lyrics, sometimes a little bit of distance, time, and hard-earned maturity is needed to gain such clarity. A lot of the realizations stung, but once I accepted them, I was finally able to release the troves of shame and loathing I held buried away for so long.
    [8]

    Al Varela: One of the hardest parts of growing up is falling out with a close friend: not necessarily losing them, but having both moved on to your own lives and you only see them from a distance. The way Rina Sawayama paints this picture is utterly heartbreaking, as she reminisces about her and her best friend wasted and blasting Carly Rae Jepsen, making fun of each other’s exes and getting in trouble. She wants to see them again, but her fear and insecurity always grips her shoulders and pulls her back. Sawayama calls herself a bad friend, but the massive, crowd-pleasing bridge where she asks the audience to “put their hands up if they’re bad at this stuff” implies how many people go through this situation — and how maybe, just maybe, that friend feels the exact same way. 
    [9]

    Alfred Soto: “So don’t ask me where I’ve been/Been avoiding everything” is a Couplet For Our Times, no question, but even if we hadn’t spent nine months standing 60 feet apart from food delivery people many of us understand how age, familiarity, and coupledom impinge on a platonic intimacy that culturally we’re not supposed to take seriously. Rina Sawayama understands. Her pained, almost embarrassed delivery — the attitude of someone used to being shamed for sharing these impressions — saves “Bad Friend” from a rather blah electronically tinged production.
    [6]

    Kylo Nocom: I’ve had many discussions with friends about how disappointing Sawayama was. I wasn’t able to pinpoint what exactly bothered me about the record — my concerns of catering to the white gaze were actively addressed on “Tokyo Love Hotel,” the album was more sincere than the fake pop star shtick of her EP, and I did enjoy many of the singles. All I could figure out is that the exact moment Sawayama starts actively sucking is when the fake gospel choir shit comes in on this song.
    [4]

    Oliver Maier: “Bad Friend” exemplifies two of the issues that hinder Sawayama for me: schlocky melodies, and lyrics that fail to unpack whatever it is the song purports to be about. Rina insists she’s a bad friend, but she’s never clear as to why or how, and I don’t think she’s really sure herself. One might expect conflict to manifest in the second verse, puncturing the nostalgic and (more importantly) detailed first verse about this friendship’s honeymoon period. Instead she only shrugs: “Guess we fell out, what was that all about?”. Is that not what you’re meant to be telling us? “God, it’s insane how things can change like that” — damn, dude, it sure is! It’s not that I think Rina is obliged to lay her most incriminating anecdotes on record, but there’s almost no evidence of reflection here, and the song reads as more than a little insincere. “Bad Friend” is an attempt at self-awareness without self-examination, with the worst offense saved for the middle eight: “Put your hands up if you’re not good at this stuff” is at about the same level of responsibility and clarity as lamenting the difficulty of “adulting.” Lack of nuance works for an EP about hyper-exaggerated pop personas and digital alter-egos, but less so for a debut album explicitly pushed as deeply/disarmingly/undeniably personal. What does work are the ace chorus melody, the “The Middle”-style vocoder harmonies thereon, and the production, which through its swells and shimmers tells a story that Rina cannot.
    [5]

    Scott Mildenhall: Euphoria, acrimony and gut-punching retrospection: all things hinted at by “Bad Friend”; all but the first left bafflingly under-explored. The lyrical detail is lacking, and the emotional weight doesn’t cover for it, nor the extent to which it was genuinely raw for Sawayama. There is so much potential in the thoughts, feelings and circumstances that inspired this song, but she harnesses them only as well as the most middling mainstream star might. Would people like this as much if it was by Rita Ora? Well, of course they would — just quite a lot more of them, if not all of the same ones.
    [7]

    Harlan Talib Ockey: As a hardcore “XS” and “Comme des Garçons” stan, I desperately hoped we’d get to cover something by Rina Sawayama this week — and then a finger curled on the monkey’s paw. Is that an unfair reaction? “Bad Friend”‘s reputation seems to be suffering from the “sincerity is uncool” curse, as well as from following the flawless initial trio of singles. But there’s a significant amount worth spending time with here. The lyrical storytelling in the first verse through to is a masterclass in evoking nostalgia through specificity. The dorkiness (“sparks and shit,” that “Call Me Maybe” shout-out) only builds our connection to the narrator; there’s a point where it becomes legitimately difficult to remember that Sawayama isn’t your actual friend. The most obvious misstep, then, is when that deeply personal atmosphere is disrupted by the gospel choir in the bridge, which feels like a church group aggressively barging in on your emotional conversation. Some songs don’t need to be universalized, especially when their greatest strength is their familiarity and candor.
    [8]

    Michael Hong: Beautiful how the tenderness of the verses contrasts the ugliness of the vocoder-processed chorus, the stuff she wants you to hear versus the stuff she has to get out there. Not to you, really, just things she needed to spit out. Is it better to apologize, or should you just leave things be? Am I just making a mess by reopening old wounds? We’re both just cowards, aren’t we? Please don’t take it personal. Rina gives it all she can in that last word, the one that manages to peek through the autotune and lets you know that if you needed to, wanted to, reach out for some reason, I’m still here she’s still there.
    [9]

    Nortey Dowuona: Washing-machine synths spin behind Rina’s warm trill as the e-bass swirls then splits. Rina’s echoes bind themselves to her, but she sends them off to bring in skipping drums, and shaking percussion. The bass spins up and snatches away the echoes, as Rina flies away.
    [10]

    Vikram Joseph: Unlike much of Sawayama — which frequently feels like it’s been produced by seven different people simultaneously, and then packed into a compression cube — “Bad Friend” allows Rina space to breathe and room to be a little bit sentimental, and is far better for it. Referencing Carly Rae Jepsen both lyrically and musically, it shimmers and sparkles and glows in a way that actually feels like the hot summer nights under Tokyo lights that Rina recalls. Both the vocoder a cappella first chorus and the gospel-inflected middle eight are quiet triumphs. But the single’s real emotional heft is the revelation that the friends in question never fell out, but drifted apart so quietly they didn’t realise it was happening. “Bad Friend” is about realising that someone you used to know intimately now lives a life that you can’t relate to at all, and the queasy sequelae of that realisation: were you ever close at all? Does this disparity reflect a personal failing on your part, a retrogression relative to the inexorable outward tide of adulthood? There are times when no amount of rationalising can push those ideas back; they creep under door frames and through the gaps in the single-glazed windows of your psyche, the insidious vapour of self-doubt.
    [8]

    Wayne Weizhen Zhang: How do you shake the sticky feeling that everyone is secretly mad at you or hates you, even if you can rationalize why that isn’t true? How do you prevent social anxiety from slowly dismantling your relationships, like freezing water creating cracks in the pavement at night? What is the recourse for redeeming a derelict friendship? (Is there one?) What if there was music therapy–pre-dating the pandemic, but given new context and texture during it–from one of the best pop stars of the moment to ruminate on the possibilities?
    [9]

    Katherine St Asaph: One of the loneliest feelings is that of watching, helplessly, as your relationships decay from social to parasocial. The shame grows exponentially — you lose friends often, seldom regain any — and never fades; if there’s a point it stops hurting, I doubt I’ll live to reach it. And the feeling is lonely in the literal sense as well as the representational. Being dumped, while painful, is at least socially acceptable; being friend-dumped is not. There’s endless content about how to rid yourself of that awful person but almost none about how to live with yourself, the awful person of whom they’re now rid. Almost nothing tells you how to stop wanting to run through bright lights again, or karaoke your hearts out to Carly (the details here are… precise) or just be okay in the eyes of someone you were close to. Maybe that’s why there are so many pop songs like “Bad Blood” to give ex-friends sassy thank-u-nexts, and so few from the other side, to give them empathy. Like Sawayama‘s “Chosen Family,” “Bad Friend” is uncomplicated, even sappy. The vocoded chorus comes off as a mumbled confession but is also basically Zedd, and “put your hands up if you’re bad at this stuff” is not far, really, from Logic’s “who can relate!” But how else could it be? The songs tend toward teenpop because we barely allow these feelings in teens, let alone adults. The lyrics are blunt since the situation’s too undiscussed for metaphor; they provide no answers, since you never get any. Of course the pop songs on the subject have a Disney-ballad lilt (and even the non-pop songs have a narcotic drift). The sound is palliative: a best painkiller forever.
    [6]

    Alex Clifton: I’ve had a number of devastating friend breakups, all my fault because I don’t know how to temper myself. Chasing the kind of closeness I’ve seen in movies and TV, I’ve fallen into obsessive relationships where I build my life around the other person and become their shadow. Slowly I realize that I can’t anticipate their every need, or that I’m not exactly what they wanted, or, more heartbreakingly, that they don’t care to reciprocate. Balance has never been my strong point, so I go too hard the other way, avoiding casual messages because I can’t bring myself to face how badly I’ve fucked it up. After that, my only choice is to watch them shift into someone I can’t know. It hurts to get updates from afar, even small ones like the new music they’re into, but it’s leagues better than wrecking myself in a fruitless quest for impossible affection. This sounds like a dramatic teenage problem, yet well into adulthood, I still haven’t figured out how to have strong, lasting, healthy friendships. It’s why “Bad Friend” strikes close to my heart — finally, an anthem for those among us who struggle with basic human connection. There aren’t enough songs about the dissolution of friendships — I’ve made my own playlist of “breakup songs” that are repurposed from romantic relationships — but Sawayama’s made an important entry into the canon, which captures the sensation of realizing how you’ve destroyed something that should’ve been easy.
    [10]

    Austin Nguyen: The guilt of friendships gone awry from time and distance by way of the Lost in Translation screenplay, vocoder-accentuated emptiness (an added vocal layer of what could’ve been), and freefalls into numbed silence. Elsewhere — the “Running Up That Hill” synths in the intro, how the bridge could segue into High School Musical 2: Gospel Edition — Sawayama misses, but I think this is how I was supposed to feel during graduation, if I had one?
    [6]

    Will Adams: On a sunny day in March 2012 I stood on the curb of an airport. I’d just been dropped off by my friends K and A, after spending the entire ride holding back tears. (I’m not sure why; I’d already sobbed in front of them and the six others we’d spent the whole week with during spring break, for the same reason.) Over the past six months I’d felt the euphoric sensation of finally belonging, of deep, trusting connection, until the clock struck midnight and a thought loomed: “Will I ever be this happy again?” As the months went on, signs increasingly pointed to “no.” Three of them would graduate that spring, in a few years I would too, we’d move to different cities, and our relationships would dim to a familiar but faint glow. It seems Rina Sawayama has experienced this, too. The details are different, but the ending is the same; the dazzling, intense moments where we laughed, sang our hearts out to Carly and poured out our deepest truths — they were the first people I came out to — would eventually become weak tethers: texting them on their birthday, only to notice the last time I’d texted was one year ago; congratulating an engagement via Instagram comment; knowing they’re in med school but not which one; replying “I don’t know” when my mother asks how they’re doing. It’s easy enough to blame this on the digital age or Growing Up™, but at a certain point the needle points to me. Is it my fault? “Bad Friend” opens with sparkles and nostalgic synths before Rina confronts that same question with a suffocating vocoder. From there are the familiar reasons why — we fell out, I’m just a shitty person, no one wanted my company anyway — until the bridge, which takes the pop cliche of “put your hands up” — just like those songs we sang — and reverbs it beyond recognition, as if to evoke a foggy memory of those nights. There’s a bittersweet, if cautious, optimism buried in the lyrics — “I’m so good at crashing in” — and the mostly bright arrangement, but the collapsing final “friend” seals it. “Bad Friend” is the sound of my anxieties of the past eight years condensed into three minutes. It’s the kind of song I’ll always treasure; it hurts, but it lets me know me I’m not alone.
    [10]

    Ian Mathers: Wow, this managed to make me: 1) feel bad about not keeping up with everyone I care about (there’s a lot of them); 2) remember all the times people I care about have clearly felt horrible about the same thing and how much I’m willing to cut them slack (depression, work, lack of time, w/e) without ever doing the same for myself; 3) miss even the smallest “oh yeah we should hang out” interaction, since clearly 2020 and at least the beginning of 2021 won’t give us even those. So now I’m in the weird spot of, indeed, putting my hands up because I’m not good at this, and thinking about all the people I’m going to hug next time I see them (assuming they’re into it). Sawayama keeps writing great songs about messy stuff; long may she continue.
    [8]

    Aaron Bergstrom: The crux of “Bad Friend” is that it doesn’t really sound like Rina Sawayama is a bad friend. Her worst offense seems to be her susceptibility to distance and the passage of time, her inability to make it 2012 forever. This doesn’t stop Rina from blaming herself, which is what makes this song so deeply relatable. The devil on her shoulder has a vocoder, and he’s all too happy to provide ominous amplification for all of her darkest thoughts. Luckily, she has a choir of angels on her other shoulder, and they burst in just in time with a show of solidarity, granting forgiveness and permission to be human, after which Rina is willing to soften her self-assessment to “maybe I’m a bad friend.” That small shift toward acceptance is enough to cast the whole song as a euphoric epiphany. If we’re lucky, “Bad Friend” will provide the soundtrack for the transcendent moments of a new generation, convinced as always that they will be young forever. They will not. They will drift apart. They will blame themselves. The passage of time will remain undefeated.
    [9]

  • Tami Neilson – You Were Mine

    Next, via Alexander, some throwback soul…


    [Video]
    [6.78]

    Alexander Barton: An absolute scorcher, “You Were Mine” finds Tami Neilson bereaved, bothered and bedeviled as she sorts through a traumatic loss. Neilson’s been doing this stuff for years, and she’s never sounded better, pouring gallons of venom into each “before” and “after.” Her idol Sharon Jones would have been proud and probably would have covered this.
    [10]

    Thomas Inskeep: Adele does Amy Winehouse, with a soupçon of Eartha Kitt for seasoning — but singing a dull retro pastiche of a song.
    [4]

    Rose Stuart: I want to make a joke that in New Zealand we have more to offer than vintage throwbacks by women with smoky voices, but when the music is this good, who cares? “You Were Mine” does nothing groundbreaking with its instrumentation, though the flourishes in the drumbeat do keep it interesting, and the lyrics start off as delightfully poetic but soon become middle of the road. But let’s be honest: This song can be as simple as it wants because it lives and dies on Tami’s voice. And what a voice. 
    [8]

    Juana Giaimo: I love subtlety, self-control and ellipsis. I think good pop songs generally have at least one of those things, and that’s why many singers may not have the greatest voice but can still move us. On “You Were Mine,” Tami Neilson shows off her voice and pours her heart out, but it’s all so straightforward that there is nothing left to the listener.
    [4]

    Nortey Dowuona: Shaky guitar lies over the drums, hollowed-log bass and Tami’s burning, restless croon. She pulls a thudding tom groove from the sand and sets it ablaze, forming it into a shield. The dunes continue to rise as Tami pulls up another thudding tom groove, setting it ablaze and this time forging a sword.
    [6]

    Jeffrey Brister: Mournful soul is 100% my shit–the swinging drums, each carefully placed flourish of notes, the sparking sensation of the snare and guitar hitting together. As “You Were Mine” starts its build to the chorus, every instrument becomes more insistent, filling the silence of the verses, until Neilson’s voice rises over the top in a moment of raw transcendence. It’s close to perfect, the way she executes something so difficult in a way that feels effortless.
    [9]

    Katherine St Asaph: Proposal: No more “wow, she can really sing real music!” retro-soul revivalists unless they’re at least this good.
    [7]

    Edward Okulicz: The song’s brand-new-retro sound really only goes back to about 2008, but I can’t deny that Tami Neilson wallops the life into the song. It matters only slightly that there’s really only enough song for 2 minutes; I could listen to Neilson for much longer than that.
    [6]

    Ian Mathers: Depends on your appetite for unabashed throwbacks, I guess, but for me if I come away from your single going “I’d love to hear her take on, say, ‘I Put a Spell on You’,” then you’re doing something right.
    [7]